Search found 22 matches

Result: There was a fundamental flaw in the industrial-strength computer billing and reimbursement program. Upon detailed manual investigation, input fields were not being auto-populated properly and were also being automatically erroneously calculated. Thus billings were sent out that were less tha...

Right, agreed handn. A lot of nothing in the immediate moon travel. I'm not using any orbs, just noting what the Moon has left to hit in its Pisces travel. Perhaps there is something yet to discover about the entire situation that no one has considered yet, a non-dualistic option, between the early ...

Hi Handn - I know what you are saying, but I still like to provide concrete answers. To me, many considerations of judgement can turn into cop-outs and excuses, and in my experience most cases of early/late degree can still be given a solid answer besides 'too early to tell' and so on. Also I've fou...

Thanks for your review. I agree it's an odd one. When such a big underdog wins, I'd certainly like to see at least a "blank canvas" chart. One that is neutral for either team. To have one with such a strong favorite bias, and a 13-1 dog win is certainly odd, and hopefully an extreme except...

Someone explain this game

Charlotte 108: LA Lakers 95 7:41pm Los Angeles March 26 2008 Pull up this chart and take a look... Charlotte was a 13 point underdog, at 14.00 odds to win. LA was 1.05. Not only is there's nothing clear in the chart for Charlotte, but there's AntiPOF within 1 degree of 10th. I'm interested to see i...

NBA March 9 2008

NBA Sacramento v LA Lakers -14 odds 11.50 1.06 actual start around 6:42 PM PDT, March 9, 2008 Los Angeles, CA Sac 114:LAL 113. Ur7 strikes again along with Moon opp POF. That's a pretty powerful combo for underdogs often to cover the spread. Winning outright is another thing entirely, but this time ...

Hi Uber, I noticed that last night as well and took a look. I honestly have no good idea what makes any game or event high scoring vs low scoring. To date, I've found no correlation with lots of angle hits, lack of angle hits or aspects, or anything with the score. One possibility may be the diurnal...

Scunthorpe United - Bristol City, 19.30 GMT This is a tough one to assign houses. Looking at the odds averaging ( oddsoddsodds.com ) at 60 bookmakers for Asian handicap, I see that for +0 , Scunthorpe averages 1.88, Bristol 1.96. Very close and usually I like it to be clearer, but I'll assign Brist...

Thanks Andrew. You do write lots of good stuff, I agree :D I just want to make it easier for as many people as possible (including me!) to see the charts and contribute if they want. Really just writing the time is enough. No need to go back at all, just for future games would be great. I have no pr...

Go to advanced search