FYI I'm not a lawyer. US Presidents don't have explicit immunity from criminal prosecution, but there are other precedents that make the situation unclear and would likely force a judicial decision first, either way. http://www.justanswer.com/law/0x6rt-us-president-criminally-prosecuted-offenses-co...

http://astrologyresearch.forumatic.com/ ... 371&p=1101

Appears it's Leo Knegt, not his son Joost, who did this. Methodology used appears to be in the (admittedly poorly formatted) post.

Mark wrote: So have I understood you correctly that you are stating these terms evolved to reflect primary motion or what Schmidt calls ''the motion of the same''? Zoidsoft wrote: Yes. In that case since angularity and cadency derive from the motion of the same ie primary motion is there much logic...

Mark wrote:Zoidsoft wrote:

There are 2 motions, the motion of the Same, and the motion of the Other.

I take it this is Robert Schmidt's way to rephrase what the rest of the astrological community calls primary and secondary motion?

It's from the Timaeus I think.

Marseille Tarot by Camelia Elias, just recently published, might be of interest, Mark. She's also got a blog at https://taroflexions.wordpress.com/

Mystical Origins of the Tarot is really neat, Mark.

Looking forward to seeing it, Mark!

English is just your 13th language, Levente.

Hello all, I think perhaps looking at both the "natural" zodiac and the scheme of the Thema Mundi would be a more interesting, if perhaps more complicated, fit. In either set-up, Mercury would always manage the third. The only other scenario where that happens is the 9th, where it's always...

It's fine, Mark, I'm in no hurry to vent on it! I'm curious what others would say, I do feel quite isolated in my position on this subject.

GR wrote: Shouldn't that be the other way around, Mark? The "Platonic vs Aristotelian" thing? I think I know what you are getting at Gabe but perhaps you could elaborate your point for the benefit of forum readers? That the Platonic is the "less literal" way and the Aristotelian...

Shouldn't that be the other way around, Mark? The "Platonic vs Aristotelian" thing? I'd add: Honestly the only mistake here is that he thinks psychological anything is any different than tarot reading. Both are very mantic, as is most astrological practice. But that's the problem, isn't it...