Another example: sun, Venus, Ascendant in Taurus, moon in Aquarius, Saturn in Cancer, Jupiter in
Libra, Mars, Mercury in Gemini. In his first years, the native had great political prestige, affairs, and
positions of trust. The rulers [Venus moon] of the triangle [Taurus Virgo Capricorn] happened to be at
angles [Ascendant, MC].

Later his livelihood was ruined and he become a vagabond. Mars and Mercury
were in opposition to the Place of Accomplishment and the rulers [Saturn Jupiter] of the Lot and of the Place of Accomplishment preceded angles [IC Descendant]

Another example: sun, Mercury in Gemini, moon in Capricorn, Saturn, Mars in Aquarius, Venus,
Ascendant in Cancer, Jupiter in Scorpio. This man, though born a slave, entered a noble family, attained
political offices, and enjoyed honors.

The rulers [Saturn Mercury] of the triangle of the sun [Gemini
Libra Aquarius] and of the Lot and the exaltation were found in their own domains and in aspect with
Jupiter. /83P/ Mars, Saturn, and Mercury were unfavorably situated and so reduced his means and made
him financially embarrassed.

*Editor's note*
This example doesnt clearly specify which sign the Lot of Fortune is in so I left it out to avoid confusion. I believe the text is suggesting its in either Gemini or Aquarius though.

EDIT: The Lot of Fortune is in the sign Aquarius.

Another example: sun in Aquarius, moon, Jupiter in Scorpio, Saturn in Cancer, Mars, Venus, Mercury
in Capricorn, Ascendant in Pisces. This man was a eunuch, a distinguished priest of the goddess. /87K/

The ruler [Jupiter] of the Lot happened to be in Scorpio, [the IX Place of] the God. The rulers of the
[diurnal] sect, Saturn and Mercury, were found in Good Daimon, but in opposition. Therefore he fell into
a great many troubles and losses and quarrels with governors and kings.

*Editor's note*
The text doesn't specify which sign the Lot of Fortune is in so I left it out; the Lot could be in Pisces or Sagittarius.

*This is the last chart for page 37*

kubernetes wrote:

*Editor's note*
This example doesnt clearly specify which sign the Lot of Fortune is in so I left it out to avoid confusion. I believe the text is suggesting its in either Gemini or Aquarius though.

interesting exercise here kubernetes.. thanks for sharing... i can tell you that based on this chart, the lot of fortune would land in aquarius... cheers james

james_m wrote:

kubernetes wrote:

*Editor's note*
This example doesnt clearly specify which sign the Lot of Fortune is in so I left it out to avoid confusion. I believe the text is suggesting its in either Gemini or Aquarius though.

interesting exercise here kubernetes.. thanks for sharing... i can tell you that based on this chart, the lot of fortune would land in aquarius... cheers james

Thanks! I just edited the post to include that information

kubernetes wrote:I love the detailed examples that Valens provides in his text, but the problem is that I have difficulties visualizing all the details and positions that he describes. I would much rather just look at an actual chart in order to grok all the details. I'm using this text:

https://www.csus.edu/indiv/r/rileymt/Ve ... entire.pdf

Just for your information, there is a new updated print version of Riley's translation of the Anthology available that has all of the charts included in nice clear round chart format. The typesetting is good as well.

The Anthology, Paperback – October 16, 2022 by Vettius Valens (Author), Chris Brennan (Editor), Mark T Riley (Translator).
Publisher ??? : ‎ Amor Fati Publications (October 16, 2022)
Language ??? : ‎ English
Paperback ??? : ‎ 440 pages
ISBN-10 ??? : ‎ 0998588911
ISBN-13 ??? : ‎ 978-0998588919
Item Weight ??? : ‎ 1.67 pounds
Dimensions ??? : ‎ 7 x 0.89 x 10 inches

From the book description.

This book includes a full translation of all 9 surviving books of the Anthology, along with diagrams inserted into the text to help visualize each of Valens' chart examples. The book also includes an extensive survey by Mark Riley of what is known about Valens' life and work, as well as a foreword by Chris Brennan.

[bold by me]

Regards.
~AJ

AJ wrote:Just for your information, there is a new updated print version of Riley's translation of the Anthology available that has all of the charts included in nice clear round chart format. The typesetting is good as well.

Or, for a reader-friendly, free PDF version, also with charts, see this:
http://skyscript.co.uk/forums/viewtopic.php?p=122036

I had forgotten about Jane's document! Thanks for the reminder Martin

martin, or anyone

regarding valens use of the part of fortune and houses extended off the part of fortune - this technique seemed popular in hellenistic astrology and we see a lot of examples in the charts that kubernetes has provided here....

how do you personally use the part of fortune and its connection with the rest of the chart in this regard? do you use quadrant houses, or whole sign houses? or - is this a hellenistic technique that you no longer use? thanks..

Martin Gansten wrote: Or, for a reader-friendly, free PDF version, also with charts, see this:
http://skyscript.co.uk/forums/viewtopic.php?p=122036

That's great resource Martin, and free too; thanks for pointing us to that.

I thought the book was pretty spendy at 47 USD though there are copies available on the used book market now for about 30 USD, that is where I got mine.

Books are maybe fast becoming an anachronism but I do prefer to have a printed book in my hand. I also don't need to recharge the battery on my laptop. lol.

james_m wrote:martin, or anyone

regarding valens use of the part of fortune and houses extended off the part of fortune - this technique seemed popular in hellenistic astrology and we see a lot of examples in the charts that kubernetes has provided here....

how do you personally use the part of fortune and its connection with the rest of the chart in this regard? do you use quadrant houses, or whole sign houses? or - is this a hellenistic technique that you no longer use? thanks..

I only consider the whole sign houses from fortune angles, I don't consider the dynamic angles or quadrant houses in this case. I think it's just way too much extra complexity. I don't even consider close aspects/conjunctions between the Lot of Fortune and planets; I only use the whole sign aspects.

I base my reasoning on the observation by Robert Schmidt that entire signs/houses get "angularized" by the presence of the Lot of Fortune, implying that the specific degree (marked by the Lot of Fortune) doesn't really matter. This is just my casual opinion based on inference, it's definitely not comprehensive.

thanks kubernetes

i approach it the same way as you do.. i was hoping those quadrant house adherents would chime in on this, but alas - i might not be so lucky, lol... keep up the interesting posts.. cheers james