Astrophilus wrote: Sun Feb 02, 2025 4:48 pm Yes, that's what I had in mind when I was talking about the increasing alienation between astrologers and their stargazing roots. We are used to viewing the stars from the abstract one-dimensional perspective of the wheel chart. Most people can't even estimate the trajectory of the ecliptic/zodiac across the sky, or understand the difference between the tropical sign of Aries and the constellation of Aries.

The most people even do not know that at -for example-3 p.m, the sun is in the third quadrant
of the current horoscope.
That is shocking.

Astrophilus wrote: Mon Feb 03, 2025 7:26 pm "Fidibus" is like a lighter - always trying to ignite our brains with the aphorisms that he throws in. We have to differentiate between the real light in the sky and the false one that we see on screen.

The method in short:

– A kind of “pointer” is directed through the chart, in both directions.
The clockwise direction is also called right rhythm or fate rhythm.
The counter-clockwise rhythm is also called left rhythm or phenomenal rhythm.

Fidibus wrote: Tue Feb 04, 2025 1:06 pm I'm not a fan of the Munich School. It is true that during the founder's lifetime he had a kind of guru status among many of his followers. I can't say how that developed. This was probably because he interpreted many events correctly and was able to assign the date almost exactly. His method helped me to pinpoint births of children, moves, marriages, etc. to the exact day. What is important is always the actual result and not the perceived belief in or against something. But I have my own method, only occasionally using fragments of the Munich School. I haven't learned anything here in this forum yet. There is a lot of talk but little said.