49 by Deb Deb and Susie, I have emailed you a list of odds which I hope will help you. Alternatively if you're more comfortable with decimals than fractions, most of the betting sites have an option to view the odds in decimals. That is so good of you! I haven't received it, but for some reason my email is really playing up at the moment, and some emails are taking ages to arrive. Some just give up and don't bother, but hopefully this will be one of the lucky ones. If I don't get it in a day or two, I'll let you know. Thanks Ficina, Deb PS - Welcome back Andrew. Are you going to join the Skyscript league? (See thread headed: take part). Quote Tue Aug 19, 2008 2:13 pm
50 by john Gem, Do I sense that you have a theory forming regarding the condition of the LOH? Would you care to elaborate further??? Quote Tue Aug 19, 2008 5:40 pm
51 by Andrew Bevan Gem said: Deb, can I ask a question please, regarding the Lord of Hour? In traditional practice, was the condition of the LOH considered important or noted at all in electional work? The Lord of Hour = planetary hours For electing an auspiscious hour, reference is given to the lord of the hour and those matters and affairs that come under it's domain. I thought this was electional. Am I getting you wrong, Gem? With Neptune being occulted on last Saturday prior to the Lunar eclipse maybe the signs of Pisces, Aquarius and Cancer are vulnerable to a mishap during the season? Pisces could be a foreigner, Aquarius the team and the Moon (or Cancer) the player. Or maybe I could stretch myself and say the the Premier League is so essential and fundamental in Great Britian that a lunar eclipse on this day is a warning of other unexpected turns in line for the nation. The Labour Party is not doing all that well and then there is that question of Charles and the throne... Does 'what ever is going on in British football' tells us something about anything else going on at the same time? http://www.astronor.com Quote Tue Aug 19, 2008 6:29 pm
52 by Deb Hi Andrew, It?s an interesting thought that the lunar eclipse might affect the whole season. You are right about the Labour party but the ?question of Charles and the throne? has been going on since the day he was born. It?s the last thing anyone here is thinking about at the moment. Does 'what ever is going on in British football' tells us something about anything else going on at the same time? Well, at the same time, and being completely ignored in the forum, is the fact that we are holding onto third position in the Olympics, with only two Superpowers ahead of us. It?s the best Olympic performance we?ve put in for over 100 years. I?m sure that people here have to be feeling better about themselves for that. BTW, I?ve also realised that 2012, when we host the Olympics, is also the year of the Queen?s Diamond Jubilee, which will fall about a month before the Olympics start. Everytime the Queen has a jubilee there is a huge upsurge in public mood here. I missed the golden jubilee (I was over in Norway actually) but I?m determined to be here for the Diamond anniversary. In fact the month before that is my 50th b?day, so it will be a big disappointment for me if the world does come to an end the week before then, as some people say it will. Quote Wed Aug 20, 2008 7:33 am
53 by Ficina we are holding onto third position in the Olympics, with only two Superpowers ahead of us. It?s the best Olympic performance we?ve put in for over 100 years. I think it's absolutely brilliant! USA and China have twice as many athletes competing as we have. I was shouting at the TV screen during Christine Ohuruogu's race yesterday Very interesting what you say about 2012, Deb. Since we've managed to survive beyond so many previous dates predicted for the end of the world, I don't see why this one should be any different Quote Wed Aug 20, 2008 8:32 am
54 by Andrew Bevan I notice on the day of the eclipse, followed by the Moon VOC - a lot of favourites were dropping out and failing. That is, of course, beside the discussion and observations of this thread. Well done Britain! Yes, I also enjoy to see the brilliant British Olympic performances! 3TA52 was rising in London at the time of the Lunar Eclipse. This is the exaltation degree of the Moon. Exact the NN of Prince Charles at 3TA56. Prince Charles has his natal Moon at 0TA26, as the Queen has her natal Sun at 0TA12. This angularity of Royalty would appear to be coinciding with the British success! Last edited by Andrew Bevan on Wed Aug 20, 2008 9:12 am, edited 1 time in total. http://www.astronor.com Quote Wed Aug 20, 2008 8:55 am
55 by Ficina Susie, I've just had a quick look at your rugby chart and what stands out is Jupiter (L4) sitting on the Asc in 12th. According to John Frawley, who as we know gives the Asc to the faves, this is a strong testimony for the underdogs. If we give the Asc to the home team, then this testimony favours NZ. The big question is, who were the faves in this game? Quote Wed Aug 20, 2008 9:09 am
56 by Andrew Bevan China must be like a second home ground to the British - thinking about all the tea you drink! Go, go - Great Britain!! http://www.astronor.com Quote Wed Aug 20, 2008 9:14 am
57 by SusieN Hi Ficina The faves are N Z, and for a bit I felt like giving them the Asc because Saturn in the 9th painted a clear picture for doing so, and rightaway I felt conflicted in my choice of sigs In the end, the South Africans pretty played like one would expect from Moon applying to Neptune and then opposing the Sun - they had no strength, playing too "loosely", and in general not getting a foot on the ground! They are now dubbed the "Bumbleboks" by the press The score at half time was 5-0 to N Z - that made sense, because neither team were particularly switched on, and the press remarked that N Z really didn't play that well at all either. Score at the end though 19-0 to N Z - horror of horrors! I thought the score would be more even, since I couldn't see strong testimony for a clear winner. How wrong was I! Cheers, Susie Quote Wed Aug 20, 2008 9:43 am
58 by Ficina Score at the end though 19-0 to N Z - horror of horrors! Golly! Well, I guess it all comes down to which method one chooses for interpreting the chart since your analysis makes perfect sense. From my own point of view though, I see this as a victory for giving the Asc to the home team since past experience has shown that planetary emplacement, i.e. sigs conj angles, is the most reliable indicator of success. Interesting Quote Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:03 am
59 by UBER SusieN wrote:Hi Ficina The faves are N Z Score at the end though 19-0 to N Z - horror of horrors! Hi, Susie! I avoid such situations when there is no clear favorite. ASC-DSC axis in critical degrees (on border of moon's day). MC-IC axis in early degrees. (non radical) Moon and Jupiter in critical degrees. Critical degrees (I guess especially Moon and ASC-DCS) signify every so often big score for one team and zero for another team. AntiPOF square Moon (orb 4, close for cricket)! Powerful testimony of favorite losing! PS. It is not hindsight thing, seariously. Last edited by UBER on Thu Aug 21, 2008 1:04 pm, edited 3 times in total. Alexey Quote Wed Aug 20, 2008 12:03 pm
60 by Gem john wrote:Gem, Do I sense that you have a theory forming regarding the condition of the LOH? Would you care to elaborate further??? Haven't gone that far yet but I'm beginning to think that looking at the condition of the LOH together with the main sigs may make sense. Andrew wrote:Could the fact that the the season started in the shaddow of the lunar eclipse have any effect upon how this season will develop? Possibly, especially because the eclipse fell on the angles(could it be ominous for the champions??), although it didn't seem to have any effects on the match itself(Arsenal-W Brom). Quote Wed Aug 20, 2008 3:59 pm