13 by pankajdubey Thanks Yuzuru, What do you think was the clinching bit of astrological evidence in this negative outcome. regards PD Quote Sat Mar 21, 2009 7:53 am
14 by yuzuru Hi, PD First of all, I forgot to thank you all, PD, PFN, Stella, Silver, Tara and Carol. Second, as I said, hindsight is always 20/20. After the fact, anybody can say that it didn?t work because of X or Y. And in a yes/no question, you always have 50% chance of getting it right, so even if I got it right, it doesn?t mean that it wasn?t for pure luck. What I can say is that, at the time of the question, although all looked well in the chart, I didn?t trusted the moon/mars application to give a "yes" for reasons similar to the ones that PFN gave us. Best regards Y Meu blog de astrologia (em portugues) http://yuzuru.wordpress.com My blog of astrology (in english) http://episthemologie.wordpress.com Quote Sat Mar 21, 2009 8:38 am
15 by Tara Very instructive. Thank you for this, Yuzuru. I was blinded by L5's exaltation in the sign of radical L9 and the impending trine between them. What I should have seen was that L5 is combust -- damaged by the Sun -- so not likely that Sun would be a good carrier of its light to the desired destination. Love to see more of these self-testing opportunities. Tara Quote Sat Mar 21, 2009 3:45 pm
16 by silver I find this educational too. I thought the mutual reception between Mercury and Saturn would be another plus sig, but now the Moon's square to Mercury in the 8th looks a of a lot bigger than it did before I knew the answer LOL. This is a good learning experience. THANK YOU ________ MEDICAL MARIJUANA Quote Sat Mar 21, 2009 8:00 pm