Re Flora-Brondby, as far as I know, Flora has won the first leg 1:0 in Denmark. As for the chart, I see nothing else. The team represented by Jupiter should win or draw.

Flora has won the first leg 1:0 in Denmark.

Yes, you are right, Taurean. I edited my post.
Now why would Flora be such underdogs when playing the return match at home? Brondby have not won a match since the middle of May. Jupiter is L1. I think I shall put a small bet on Flora. What doe you think about the Tromso game? You were dead on with POF trine Uranus the other day.

What if the Flora victory in Denmark was a lucky one, Brondby played better, etc.? It happens in football. The bookies may think that the better Danish team won't fail again.

Re Karabakh-Rosenborg, agreed, the favorites should get it!

The Flora goal was scored by Tvnis Vanna. I searched around on net to see if I could find his birthdata. Then I found this instead, which is a clip with the winning goal.
Take a look:

http://forum.rojadirecta.org/viewtopic. ... highlight=

OMG

But this video gives me the opportunity to ask something. Considering the team colors, and if they are using these today as well, who-is-who, if one uses the color method. Goca said that the double-color was good for Gemini. We have double colors in both cases. Because of the stripes, one could vote for Flora being Gemini, but the green color of those stripes might be good Jupiter.

Re Troms?, yep, that Uranus-Asc trine is partile, but I'm not sure that the Uranian influence is always a help. There's a POF-L7-Venus opposition. And L1-Mars is in the 7th house. Not sitting on the desc, not at all, but in the house. I'm curious about that, but won't place a bet.

Re Torshavn, yes, Omonia to win.

I agree Flora/Brondby is a difficult one for all the reasons you've both mentioned but it could be a useful test for testimonies and colours.

My feeling is that L1 Jupiter partile trine MC is the strongest testimony. This would favour Flora as home team but is there a case for giving the Asc to Brondby as odds-on faves? Essential dignities for Mercury and Jupiter are the same, so no help there. Colourwise, Mercury could be Flora's stripes (Gemini), as Taurean has said, or Brondby's yellow (Mercury in Leo). I don't see Jupiter fitting either set of colours

(That winning goal was very impressive. I love those long-distance strikes.)

Re Tromso/Dinamo Minsk, apart from what's already been said I will just add that L7 Venus is partile conjunct Part of Successful Outcome. I mentioned this Part in a previous game after the home underdogs won. This time the underdogs are the away team so it might not work so well but it will be interesting to see if it has an effect.

I'm adding one game due to decent odds:

FC Lahti - Hit Gorica, 18.30 CST Lahti 60N58 25E40
Odds: 2,10 3,20 3,00
Asc 6SG35 MC 21LI17 Moon 22LE39 POF 28SG19
Day Jupiter, Hour Sun - radical
Gorcia won the first round 1-0. The Sun, LHr, is in the same sign at Mercury, L7. Venus, L10, is in the 7th and trine the MC. Moon casts antiscia to 7GE21, within one degree of the desc. I do believe the guests stand a good chance.

Well, I posted a lot of games today. Some got curiously messy, while others were quite good. Let's just see how we got on:

Lahti - Gorica 2-0 2,10:1
Flora - Brondby 1-4 1,57:1
Qarabagh ? Rosenborg 1-0 8,60:1
Halad?s ? Elfsborg 0-0 3,30:1
Helsinki ? Vetra 1-3 6,75:1
Tromso - Dinamo Minsk 4-1 1,60:1
T?rshavn - Omonia Nicosia 1,45:1

Assuming we had bet ?10 on each game our total stake would have been ? 70 and our return would have been ?131. Our profit would have been ?61. That is an odds of 1,87:1!

Among your predictions, the Halad?s draw and the Vetra victory are especially nice and important IMHO.

Flora match: looks like Brondby was represented by Jupiter.

Karabakh match: I think the bookies gave us misleading odds. Let me explain. I started to watch the match online on the internet, from around the 60th minute. The quality was awful, but anyway. The score was 1:0. I have seen the two teams were nearly of equal quality. OK, Rosenborg attacked a bit more, as they were losing, but thus the home side could lead dangerous counter-attacks. On the basis of the chart, I thought this game would be won and lost, so, as I play with small amounts of money, I was able the double my original bet on Rosenborg, o/c this time I put the money on Karabakh (in the 70th minute). And it was fine, as the result remained 1:0. Why were the odds misleaing for me? If the chart suggests me there would be a winner, and according to the odds there's a strong favorite, without much analyzing, checking the colors etc. I play the supposed favorite, in this case Rosenborg.

By the way, the odds of Karabakh victory in the 70th minute (live betting) ? when Karabakh lead 1:0 ? was 1,87. Isn't it surprisingly high? For me, it is, especially seeing the game. Actually, in the 87th minute, the odds of home team victory was still 1,33. It's very rare, at this stage, you freqently see odds like 1,005.

Among your predictions, the Halad?s draw and the Vetra victory are especially nice and important IMHO.

Yes, well predicted Andrew

Flora match: looks like Brondby was represented by Jupiter.

Agreed. Pity we couldn't have decided beforehand but at least we now know Mercury=stripes and probably mixed colours in general.

Your observations re Qarabagh game are very interesting. I think a case could be made for giving Rosenborg the Asc since Saturn is essentially stronger. Just out of interest, what colours were the two teams wearing?