Thanks PA, only, i apologise because, apparently- I accidentally erased a part of my previous answer.

....Then I switched to studying one thing at a time (aspects or dignities for example) but, since the curiosity has always been stronger than the previously learnt knowledge, I'd try to delineate a chart by simply examining some specific placements or aspects one at the time (well- to try to find something that would make sense at least) and, again- with no success.

I would call you a Shakespeare scholar! Much more elegant.[/

It is, isn't it? Thank you!

When they say Shakespearologist- I always "hear"- Palaeontologist!

I was curious to find this link because I delivered a paper to Olivia Barclay on this matter in 1986 as a matter that astrologers should look more into. Then she quoted my work in her book 'Horary Astrology Rediscovered' in 1990. John Frawley took the QHP after me. I am not sure that this is his invention.

http://skyscript.co.uk/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2949