13 by pankajdubey Eddy wrote: Speaking about cazimi it comes into my mind that if, contrary to cumbustion, the cazimi is positive and strengthening the cazimi planet, how can this be reconciled with the idea that an eclipse is usually seen as a bad sign? A solar eclipse is namely the cazimi of the Moon. If a planet is within 0?17' of the Sun, however, it is termed Cazimi, 'in the heart of the Sun', a position of great dignity from where it benefits by being 'at one' with the Sun's influence. from: http://www.skyscript.co.uk/heritage/egyptians.html , in footnote 3 And, I thought that this was the easier bit of the whole discussion Never heard of a Cazimi Saturn blocking the Sun and causing darkness - I am sure it would love to do that. Maybe, a better way to think about this is that Venus is eclipsed by Sun which in turn is eclipsed by Moon. PD Quote Wed Jan 13, 2010 11:54 am
14 by Eddy Should it then be considered that any dignifying effect ot the cazimi of Moon would be too weak to surpass the negative effects of the solar eclipse? Quote Wed Jan 13, 2010 12:44 pm
15 by pankajdubey Eddy wrote:Should it then be considered that any dignifying effect ot the cazimi of Moon would be too weak to surpass the negative effects of the solar eclipse? I guess so but I do not have any reference to quote. Moon will always be Cazimi when the new moon is exact but the Sun will not always be eclipsed by that phenomenon. PD Quote Wed Jan 13, 2010 1:20 pm