Morin uses the system of analogy to determine planets' meanings in a chart, because he thought that universal significations were being misused. Lots, on the other hand, "spread out" the meanings of the planets so they can be interpreted individually. Does it make sense to use both of these systems together? I can see the value of both, but I'm not sure if it would work/make sense... Can anybody help me out? Does anyone use both of these methods and can shed some light on my doubts? Thanks in advance.

Although Morin would not use them, I use them with Morin and other systems. I think it elegantly fills the holes that Morin had in his system.

best regards.

Thank you for the reply. It's reassuring to know that I am not the only one thinking of this.