37 by Clelia Romano jupiter1st wrote:Thanks for the quick reply Clelia. Can you give your father's birth data. I'd like to examine it. I?m home sick, Jupiter 1st, my only good time is to answer about astrology:-)) My father was born at 12 April, 1920, 2 PM, S?o Paulo, SP, Brazil. Lat 23S32, longitude 46W37 best Clelia http://www.astrologiahumana.com Quote Sun Sep 11, 2011 11:31 pm
38 by Konrad Clelia Romano wrote:Hello Jupiter1st! Maybe you?re right taking Venus years, but as she is with the SN I would give 1/4 less of her total years. That is the rule. But, maybe she is distant enough to be considered in body conjunction with SN. Anyway, she is still heading towards the Node and she is less than 12? from it. Another possible idea is that she, Venus, is exalted, so it can serve as a compensation for not lose 1/4 of her years. Your hyphotesis is coherent, I agree. If he lived 29 years, he was in a profection of 7th house, ruled by Venus. The Solar Revolution ( I don?t know where he was in his last birthday!) for his city, had Venus in the 12th in Pisces, the Sun in Aries in the ASC and Mars, lord of the house of death in the 4ht in the same position Jupiter was when he was born, Not to mention the Moon in the 12th in Pisces conjunct Venus of his natal chart. The theory of giving to the Sun and Moon the place of hyleg and alchocodem when they are exalted or domiciliated works perhaps if you do not find a planet receiving them and aspecting them. You can take them if they are not cadent and inconjunct to de ASC as Hyleg and Alchocodem and depending on the whole chart give them lot of years: then you try a fine tuning using directions to have an idea of the dangerous episodes against life. My father, for example, has the Sun in Aries in the 9th and Jupiter in the ASC in Leo. The Sun is at 23? and Jupiter at 7?. Very far. If Jupiter was the Alchocodem he would live 79 years. When he was 79 he was looking for a good woman to marry again. Now he is 92.No planets are in aspect ( using orbs) with his Sun. This is interesting, I think. nice example Jupiter, but a tricky one: hope we are working with the right data;-) regards Clelia jupiter1st wrote:Clelia, the Moon is domicile. She is convenient for hyleg position. Domicile Moon is a stronger hyleg candidate than exalted Sun. I didn't try to find 29 for Ledger since I've already known he died at that age. I strictly applied the rules and found 29. I did it earlier for Van Gogh as well. I was shocked when I found Van Gogh's life span astrologically. I am not that stunned now because I know that this method usually gives accurate results. In Ledger's case Venus gives 29 years. It is not a coincidence. Check the aspects and position of Venus. Can you deny that she gives 29 years? How many of you guys have Venus giving 29 years of life period? Ledger has it and he died at 29. It is a very specific situation. I can hardly think it is a coincidence. I told you guys earlier that Domicile/Exalted lights can not be both hyleg and alchohoden. Clelia and others objected to that. I now see that Clelia and many of you guys understood it can't be that way. Hi Clelia, he died in a 5th house profection as Jan 2008 meant he was 28 (as we count it in the modern world). Just reading the source notes of the Astrodatabank page makes me even more unsure that this is his real birth-time though. Quote Mon Sep 12, 2011 12:29 am
39 by Clelia Romano I would like to share with you a chart of a lady who lived 100 years. It looks like a very low profile person, and perhaps that is a hint to longevity. Observe that the only planet in an angle was the Moon, in the 2nd sign of the Nadir. She died 28 august of 2009, she simply black out. [/img] http://www.astrologiahumana.com Quote Mon Sep 12, 2011 12:39 am
40 by Clelia Romano Konrad wrote: Hi Clelia, he died in a 5th house profection as Jan 2008 meant he was 28 (as we count it in the modern world). Just reading the source notes of the Astrodatabank page makes me even more unsure that this is his real birth-time though Thank you Konrad for pointing that: I missed the real data of his death. This changes things a lot, but being Leo the sign of the year, Venus will be in the 8th house departing from Leo. Anyway, if the data is not sure...we are wandering. best Clelia http://www.astrologiahumana.com Quote Mon Sep 12, 2011 1:03 am
41 by Konrad Clelia Romano wrote:I would like to share with you a chart of a lady who lived 100 years. It looks like a very low profile person, and perhaps that is a hint to longevity. Observe that the only planet in an angle was the Moon, in the 2nd sign of the Nadir. She died 28 august of 2009, she simply black out. [/img] Woul I be right in giving the Hyleg to the ASC and the alcoocoden the Moon with Saturn taking away his greater years and the Sun and Venus adding theirs? This would give 97 years. Quote Mon Sep 12, 2011 7:44 am
42 by Hermes Would y'all be intersted in more data of people who lived to be very old? I got several. Kind regards Hermes Quote Mon Sep 12, 2011 8:08 am
43 by Konrad Hermes wrote:Would y'all be intersted in more data of people who lived to be very old? I got several. Kind regards I would Hermes, thanks. I've been looking at the quality of deaths lately and some old-lived naturally dying people would help me understand it more. Quote Mon Sep 12, 2011 8:15 am
44 by Clelia Romano Jupiter1st, I want to correct the years of Venus: Venus gives only 8 years, since she is cadent. I took your assumption for her giving 29 years...I don?t know why. My mind was kind of blurred yesterday night. Clelia jupiter1st"]Clelia, the Moon is domicile. She is convenient for hyleg position. Domicile Moon is a stronger hyleg candidate than exalted Sun. I didn't try to find 29 for Ledger since I've already known he died at that age. I strictly applied the rules and found 29. I did it earlier for Van Gogh as well. I was shocked when I found Van Gogh's life span astrologically. I am not that stunned now because I know that this method usually gives accurate results. In Ledger's case Venus gives 29 years. It is not a coincidence. Check the aspects and position of Venus. Can you deny that she gives 29 years? How many of you guys have Venus giving 29 years of life period? Ledger has it and he died at 29. It is a very specific situation. I can hardly think it is a coincidence. I told you guys earlier that Domicile/Exalted lights can not be both hyleg and alchohoden. Clelia and others objected to that. I now see that Clelia and many of you guys understood it can't be that way. http://www.astrologiahumana.com Quote Mon Sep 12, 2011 3:30 pm
45 by Clelia Romano Konrad wrote: Woul I be right in giving the Hyleg to the ASC and the alcoocoden the Moon with Saturn taking away his greater years and the Sun and Venus adding theirs? This would give 97 years I used the Moon as Alchocodem, giving 108. Saturn took away 30 years, so we get 78. Venus gives 8 years, her minor years and we add 2 years more, because she is with the North Node, so we have untill now 88 years, more the Sun minor years, 19. Total 107 years. She did not get it. It was a mistery chart, and I reached 97 years adjusting the 107 years using firdars, profectios and Solar Revolutions. At this age she fell and broke the hip, but did not die. Hermes, I want the data you offered, thank you in advance! Cl?lia http://www.astrologiahumana.com Quote Mon Sep 12, 2011 3:49 pm
46 by jupiter1st Clelia, Venus is cadent but she is exalted. That's why she can give 45 years not 8. Even if she was peregrine, I would still give 45 if she was not badly aspected by Saturn or Mars. A planet both cadent and detriment give least years. Venus in this case, is strong in Pisces but cadent in 12th. So this is a moderate situation. Besides dispozitor of Venus is exalted in Cancer. Quote Mon Sep 12, 2011 8:03 pm
47 by Clelia Romano jupiter1st wrote:Clelia, Venus is cadent but she is exalted. That's why she can give 45 years not 8. Even if she was peregrine, I would still give 45 if she was not badly aspected by Saturn or Mars. A planet both cadent and detriment give least years. Venus in this case, is strong in Pisces but cadent in 12th. So this is a moderate situation. Besides dispozitor of Venus is exalted in Cancer. Thanks for explaining it:-) The authors usually give years, mostly by the mundane position of the alchocodem, though. To quote only one author, since I?m working with Masha?allhah translation, I?ll quote him: On reception, page 54, ARHAT, translated by Robert Hand: " If the nativity is nocturnal and that planet ( the Alchocodem) is likewise nocturnal, and if it is in the sixth from the ASC or in the twelfth, and is not in its descension, it will give its lesser years. But if it is in its own descension in the twelfth or sixth place and it is retrograde, it will give months according to the number of lesser years" best regards Clelia http://www.astrologiahumana.com Quote Mon Sep 12, 2011 8:22 pm
Re: Heath Ledger's longevity 48 by Yukionna jupiter1st wrote: Besides the chart seems to be nocturnal. The Moon is hyleg. The triplicity ruler Venus trines her. So she is alcocoden. Venus is exalted but not angular. She will give 45 years. Jupiter, I have a question regarding this chart. (I'm a bit late, sorry) In the Zoller course it says: a planet gets major years when: it is oriental to the Sun OR it is in one or more of its 5 dignities OR it is in the Ascendant or in the 10th OR it is in its proper Haym He doesn't mention the alcocoden has to be angular for major years. In the case of Venus here, three of four conditions apply. How come you give her middle years? Maybe I should add that I'm not critisizing your method, it seems to work. Just trying to clarify the discrepancy. I don't want to learn this the wrong way, it's difficult enough as it is.. Yuki Quote Tue Sep 13, 2011 4:26 pm