61
Goran:

Ok, let?s try again.

I never read this in any place, but if you look and see that one planet is the hyleg the first thing ( in my experience) that you have to do is : hesitate and act as a devil attorney against yourself.
We have to be flexible and to follow the rules according to the book,closing our eyes to obvious testimonies against our first idea is not a good policy..

You?re right that Mars would not be the Alchocodem because it was in the 12th house, not aspecting the Sun. Also, he would not be able of be Hyleg because he is cadent.
By the book ( at least according to many authorities) the Sun or the Moon would be able to be Hyleg even not having an Alchocoden.
Let?s pick the Sun.
Okay, this native will live 120 years, he will be a supercentenarian. But observing this chart we can see many problematic things against life. The ASC has the meaning of life and his ruler is cadent in the 12th: the lord of life is disposed by a malefic, lord of death, in a bad house. Plus, even having a good Sun and Moon the native has the malefics configurated to houses against life. Even the lord of 7th, that Abu Ali considers very important as a killig planet , is in the 12th opposing Saturn.
I would not give much credit to the Sun giving all his 120 years.
Saturn in the 6th with the Node points to cronic illnesses...3 planets in the 12th are pointing to restrictions and to things behind close doors. All the chart has many flags against life, so I would dismiss the Sun as Hyleg because he gives too many years.
The only life spam theory able to explain the native short life is Masha?allah, when he will use the POF as Hyleg and Saturn as Alchocodem. All this IF the chart is the real one. Perhaps we are discussing for the sake of discussion itself.

Please Goran, let?s take a break on this issue:-)


best

Cl?lia
http://www.astrologiahumana.com

27 Club

63
The subject of the 27 Club came up briefly:something I have not really looked at; nevertheless whilst decumbent I heard a programme on Radio 4 recently concerning numbers and statistics.

The first article was about the health scare concerning salt. They looked at different statistics proving both that it was harmful and harmless in the long term. The reason for misunderstanding is the term significant. To you,I and Daily Mail journalists who publish these stories the word means one thing but in mathematics a very small percentage can be "significant".

Next they looked at the 27 Club story. They had to admit that there was something to it. Put simply a young teen,say, buys his first guitar and practises in his room,forms a band at 16,tours or signs contract at 18. If they make it his career hits a gap at 25 after best selling albums and so on.After a couple more years with plenty of money and little restraint the drug or drink habit gets worse and its good night Vienna.

I offer this as a possible confirmation of astrology, not a so-called "rational explanation".

Matthew

ps My ex blamed a combination of substance abuse and home swimming pools