Besides, the method is so wonderfully simple there is no need for any kind of developments. Locate the LHr and boom! you have the winner. 5 seconds with a proper software.

Well, 10 seconds if you need to think about the color a planet stands for.

Yes go ahead and use it before tonights match...if its successful then we'll carry on with the method and see where it takes us.

Seiko wrote:Sorry, man. It was a long time ago. Didn't save any of that stuff.

Besides, the method is so wonderfully simple there is no need for any kind of developments. Locate the LHr and boom! you have the winner. 5 seconds with a proper software.

Well, 10 seconds if you need to think about the color a planet stands for.

Not really. The Arabs used it in questions, not electional charts, so I am quite prepared to have to develop a system for that, taking into account factors external of the chart as well as the information contained within. I think Janis is on the right track (if such a thing exists) although, I don't find the radicality to be telling in any way but I have some ideas about that.

All those Who will win the tournament/race? questions are doomed. This is like looking for lottery numbers in the chart. Who will win the 3000m staple chase in the Olympics? -- well, I say, good luck with that, Mr. Nostradamus.

Besides, that is not the real question. People don't really care who's gonna win -- Jyvaskyla FC or Nordkopping FF. The question is about money. People should focus on that.

Event charts suck but at least they're more honest in that regard. But they still suck. Unless you own a horse, who cares who wins the race? Is someone here a die-hard fan of some horse?

daz madrigal wrote:

Besides, the method is so wonderfully simple there is no need for any kind of developments. Locate the LHr and boom! you have the winner. 5 seconds with a proper software.

Well, 10 seconds if you need to think about the color a planet stands for.

Yes go ahead and use it before tonights match...if its successful then we'll carry on with the method and see where it takes us.

I should be less sarcastic and this is one of the reasons. My bad.

Seiko wrote:Besides, that is not the real question. People don't really care who's gonna win -- Jyvaskyla FC or Nordkopping FF. The question is about money. People should focus on that.

I wouldn't dream of speaking for other people's true desires and wants, so I'll leave that one with you. As for the charts, I'll follow the Arabs for a while since they seem to be bang on with so much of the other forms of astrology. I'll either get it or I won't, ultimately it isn't too important.

Konrad wrote:

Seiko wrote:Besides, that is not the real question. People don't really care who's gonna win -- Jyvaskyla FC or Nordkopping FF. The question is about money. People should focus on that.

I wouldn't dream of speaking for other people's true desires and wants, so I'll leave that one with you. As for the charts, I'll follow the Arabs for a while since they seem to be bang on with so much of the other forms of astrology. I'll either get it or I won't, ultimately it isn't too important.

Oh, come on. Someone wants to put in effort to develop a method for predicting the winner just for kicks. Yeah, right. People've got nothing else to do. "Look, everybody, I can predict the winner in every single race. See, astrology works! No, I'm not gonna use this opportunity to become rich, how dare you! I just love to watch the races!"

Unless your home town team is playing in Finals, who ACTUALLY cares if QPR are going to beat Blackburn?

Seiko wrote:

Konrad wrote:

Seiko wrote:Besides, that is not the real question. People don't really care who's gonna win -- Jyvaskyla FC or Nordkopping FF. The question is about money. People should focus on that.

I wouldn't dream of speaking for other people's true desires and wants, so I'll leave that one with you. As for the charts, I'll follow the Arabs for a while since they seem to be bang on with so much of the other forms of astrology. I'll either get it or I won't, ultimately it isn't too important.

Oh, come on. Someone wants to put in effort to develop a method for predicting the winner just for kicks. Yeah, right. People've got nothing else to do. "Look, everybody, I can predict the winner in every single race. See, astrology works! No, I'm not gonna use this opportunity to become rich, how dare you! I just love to watch the races!"

Unless your home town team is playing in Finals, who ACTUALLY cares if QPR are going to beat Blackburn?

The thirst for knowledge, my friend, and the opportunity to be the first to do something but hey, I've wasted enough pages of this thread adding nothing to the actual predictions, so some other time.

Konrad wrote: The thirst for knowledge, my friend, and the opportunity to be the first to do something but hey, I've wasted enough pages of this thread adding nothing to the actual predictions, so some other time.

Developing a method for finding missing people or objects would also correspond to those goals.

In three of the 15:00 matches today:

Aston V - Swansea
Blackburn - Stoke
QPR - Norwich

The underdog won, as Sun conjunct Pluto in the 7th would suggest (see earlier post).

The final 15:00 match Wolves - Chelsea was won by the favourite Chelsea, but only 1-2. This might be a case for colours, Wolves in orange = Sun destroyed by being conjunct Pluto.

Graham

GB wrote:In three of the 15:00 matches today:

Aston V - Swansea
Blackburn - Stoke
QPR - Norwich

The underdog won, as Sun conjunct Pluto in the 7th would suggest (see earlier post).

The final 15:00 match Wolves - Chelsea was won by the favourite Chelsea, but only 1-2. This might be a case for colours, Wolves in orange = Sun destroyed by being conjunct Pluto.

Graham

I noticed this but then both Celtic and Rangers won quite convincingly in Scotland and wouldn't the Sun destroy Norwich too?

Here's what I do, more or less successfully. First of all, I like sports, believe or not, I follow two professional leagues, both American. Well, not religiously 24/7, but I know very darn well what's going on. Then there are a few teams from Latvia that are of casual interest to me even though I don't follow them closely.

Anyway, I'm using the Will I profit? approach if the knowledge of the sports tells me who is supposed to win. It has to be more or less organic, not a coin-in-the-slot approach (is it this one? or this one?) or just wild picks if I'm not familiar with the teams. I'm not trying to chase the spectular hits but I'm not interested in 1.05 type of odds either. A lot of times it is an underdog+handicap (i.e., even if the underdog loses but loses with fewer points than X, the wager still wins) if I feel that the team has been underestimated a little bit or the fave will struggle with their opponent. Sometimes it's an over/under the points total bet if, for example, two low-scoring teams are playing each other. Well, the usual stuff. Not a big soccer fan (except Euros or the World Cup) but a Double Chance or Under the total wager here and there doesn't hurt if you feel that it won't be to easy for the fave.

So here's me and here's the bookie's money. I don't have to guess which team is which or pick a team or a horse out of a whole bunch of teams/horses. I'm not rich (yet ) but it has served me better than anything else, well, probably because it is more organic. Look, I root for two teams (and, of course, Team Latvia in all kinds of sports I'm familiar with) but even if I'm a fan, I'm not really interested whether the team will win a regular season game (esp. if there are 82 games in a season) unless they're playing some spectacular team or fierce rivals.

Well, that's that.

Konrad wrote:I noticed this but then both Celtic and Rangers won quite convincingly in Scotland and wouldn't the Sun destroy Norwich too?

Good point

Back to the drawing board! Unless anyone else has an idea about the four matches at 15:00?

It's possible that Chelsea was such a strong favourite that Sun conjunct Pluto in the 7th was not strong enough to help the underdog win, but then I might have expected a draw ...

On a more general point, I think it's very useful to try to explain the results after the event, to help develop our ideas and methods. Some people tend to avoid the matches that all start at the same time, but I like them. You can get some of them with different rising signs than others (as at 1500 today) because of the different locations. In some the favourite is the home team, in others it's the away team - possible help in deciding if the Ascendant is the home or fav. Sometimes an angular planet is on different sides of the angle. Small differences such as these could help us decide what's important.

Graham