Display posts from previous
Sort by

Angularity-WSH or division

1 by dragonqueen
Hi
I know the fans of WSH use the Placidus angles as well,unlike Vedic astrologers.
I always had a problema with Placidus angles because I have J?piter MC,albeit in 9th sector,yet I cannot say I have benefited from it in the career and marriage ?reas,the ones J?piter rules by WSH.
I only entered J?piter firdaria this year so it may be early to say, but I often hear about how S. Stallone and Arnie or Oprah Winfrey are lucky due to their J?piter mC. I may have to look at their Firdaria before commenting, but so far I havent been convinced by all the talk about angularity by division. The nonagesimal seems to give more down to earth results

3 by dragonqueen
dragonqueen wrote:A correction-Oprah has J?piter DEC where she works in Chicago,not birhplace
http://www.astro.com/astro-databank/Winfrey,_Oprah
And since I mentioned my own chart see what Julian Lee says about J?piter MC

"Well, there is a lot more to see in a RelNat. For example, in my case, I had taken on a new ascendant -- Pisces instead of my usual Gemini. My Alaskan money house had a different ruler, Mars was now in my 2nd instead of 12th, and many other items were evident once I saw the RelNat. None of these things are depicted on linemaps. But if you want to know how income will go in a new location, you have to look at the second house--the house of money. A "Jupiter-Midheaven" won't save you if your actual money house is bad. That means occupants of the house, ruler of the house, transits and progressions to the ruler, and transits to the occupants -- all the good, classical stuff. But you won't see any second house information on a linemap. You can only see it in a RelNat.

http://www.locational-astrologer.com/interCouteau.html

Re: Angularity-WSH or division

6 by johannes susato
dragonqueen wrote:
johannes susato wrote:
dragonqueen wrote:Hi
I know the fans of WSH use the Placidus angles as well,unlike Vedic astrologers.
What do you mean by the Placidus angles, please?
the MC etc as opposed to the nonagesimal,which is supposed to be the natural angle right overhead
But the AC and MC ever and at all times being computed equally and these not being an "invention" of Placidus, your calling them "Placidus angles" seems to be rather astonishing.

Re: Angularity-WSH or division

7 by dragonqueen
johannes susato wrote:
dragonqueen wrote:
johannes susato wrote: What do you mean by the Placidus angles, please?
the MC etc as opposed to the nonagesimal,which is supposed to be the natural angle right overhead
But the AC and MC ever and at all times being computed equally and these not being an "invention" of Placidus, your calling them "Placidus angles" seems to be rather astonishing.
I said Placidus because thats the most commonly used.I know the angles are the same with all quadrant systems
In fact im going to check whether celebrities with planets at MC tend to have the MC within the 10th.That maight explain a few things

8 by dragonqueen
http://www.astrotheme.com/astrology/Angelina_Jolie

Here is one who like Stallone in CA, is known for some Martial roles

http://www.astrotheme.com/astrology/Brigitte_Bardot

Bardot is known for Venusian themes.Seewhere Venus lies,close to nonagesimal

http://www.astrotheme.com/astrology/Al_Pacino

Pacino has J?piter not far from nonagesimal but he always struvk me as Saturnine.Saturn lies at nonagesimal

http://www.astrotheme.com/astrology/David_Beckham

Man-woman Beckam has Moon at MC but in 9th house
He is known for his lunar personality off the pitch

9 by Ariondys
sounds like a job for a statistician. you'll need random sample set of celebrities. Make sure to get from north and south hemisphere in equal proportions or you'll be measuring something about the rising signs as well...

Then u can expect 50/50 to be normal.
!! Read first: forum policies
Recent topics
Post Reply

Return to “Nativities & General Astrology”