james_m wrote:this concept of vargottam - a planet in the same sign in the navamsha as it is in the rasi chart, or the concept of a planet in the navamsha being in it's ruling sign as strengthening the qualities of the planet in the rasi chart remains to be seen for me so far..
not sure how useful vargottam idea or other ideas are regarding divisional charts, in particular - navamsha chart...
Hi James: Shiva's curse again...
Vargottamma is mentioned in Saravali Chapter 3, sloka 13 (depending on your translation). Here it says that good results come to planets in vargottamma divisions. This is mostly true but Saravali does not qualify the statement, which is common in the classical texts.
In my expereince good results come only when the concerned planet is strong in the natal chart.
Planets that are weak in the natal chart do not suddenly get any stronger by being well placed in navamsa, or any other divisional chart for that matter.
A planet is deemed weak for delineation if they are neecha in navamsa and are weak for the specific area of the concerned divisional if it is neecha there.
For example, if any planet is strong in the natal and navamsa, but neecha in D10, it is weak only regarding the significations of the 10th house. If it is neecha in navamsa this makes it weak regarding all of its significations in the natal chart.
Each planet should be considered independently for its placement, strength, relationship with other planets, etc.
In Assange's chart, Me is an interesting case in vargotamma.
Mercury is weak in early degrees but without Saturns exact aspect on the equal bhava madhya of the ninth house that greatly magnifies all of the occupants, both Ketu and Mercury and Jupiters close aspect to raises its strength...
Without these other factors to strengthen Mercury's postition in his chart vargotamma wouldn't help Mercury.
[Lord, I hope that made sense]
Cheers.