1867 astrologers
Posted: Thu Nov 12, 2020 12:31 am
Nobody responded so far. Why?
http://vissesh.home.xs4all.nl/mystiek/a ... ogers.html
But you could share your by chance found findings on an astrology forum and could get many likes from an astrology minded audience. When? Why? Because you argued in their way, unaware of sampling issues. But of course you should not come with data that refuted their expectations. Then they would ignore you.
An example of this can be found here: Venus Aspects: Statistical proof of astrological effect.
The problem here lies in your control group. What is the best expectation of the average mean. Normally it would be the combined found values in the case and control groups.
http://vissesh.home.xs4all.nl/mystiek/a ... ogers.html
But you could share your by chance found findings on an astrology forum and could get many likes from an astrology minded audience. When? Why? Because you argued in their way, unaware of sampling issues. But of course you should not come with data that refuted their expectations. Then they would ignore you.
An example of this can be found here: Venus Aspects: Statistical proof of astrological effect.
The problem here lies in your control group. What is the best expectation of the average mean. Normally it would be the combined found values in the case and control groups.