Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 8:51 am
Mark: Thank you for your input. I'm glad to see we think alike on this.
Linchi: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_Hitlerum
Linchi: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_Hitlerum
Skyscript Astrology Forum
https://www.skylab.build.applab.net/forums/
https://www.skylab.build.applab.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=11562
Just to be clear, my role as moderator is not to pronounce on the astrological quality of your posts, or anyone's. (If it were, you would really see some censorship!) A moderator's job is mainly to uphold a civilized tone of discussion and prevent any flagrant breach of forum rules or misuse of the forum, and I agree with Mark that using selective examples to spread conspiracy theories falls under the last category.linchi wrote:I do not write with the intention of making you feel comfortable. [...] I would expect an astrologer to write something astrological, if, of course, he has any idea.
is not 'research', and letting it stand uncontradicted in the name of tolerance would be irresponsible. Even if everyone who reads our posts is a reasonably intelligent adult (which we do not know: forum posts can be read by anyone), as human beings we are still responsible for not filling them with potentially harmful misinformation. If people do, it is indeed the job of moderators to object.But my examples show that in this "vaccination" there is also a deadly virus.
That is simply not true. These are not small samples. When I started investigating the cases a few weeks ago, there were 260 deaths, now there are 291. At least 60-70% of those we don't have birth dates. And so far I have only examined half of the cases. Gradually I will include the others, depending on when I have the time.Mark wrote:Using a small selection of charts for propaganda purposes is in my opinion not an acceptable way to behave on Skyscript. It proves nothing except the self selecting prejudice of the poster.
Mark














Martin,Martin Gansten wrote:Irrespective of why you or anyone chooses not to be vaccinated, Michael, a statement such as:
is not 'research', and letting it stand uncontradicted in the name of tolerance would be irresponsible. Even if everyone who reads our posts is a reasonably intelligent adult (which we do not know: forum posts can be read by anyone), as human beings we are still responsible for not filling them with potentially harmful misinformation. If people do, it is indeed the job of moderators to object.But my examples show that in this "vaccination" there is also a deadly virus.










That is quite a strong reaction. The analogy with Nazi Germany lacks any objectivity. I can give you my assurance having you be lined up before a firing squad, imprisoned and tortured to death or having all your family exterminated exceeds my humble authority as a moderator here.Do you realise that there is no difference between you and 1940s Germany when you ban my examples ? But I am sure you will find a "suitable" argument.
I did not claim that all "vaccines" currently on the market are dangerous or deadly. That would be so obvious then. I am astrologically investigating the cause of death only in those deaths that have been publicly reported. We do not know how many deaths there are that have not been made public.Mark wrote: However, your approach does seem like something of an astrological cherry picking exercise. Over half the population of planet earth (4 billion people) have now received a vaccine jab. So you sample is far too microscopic to prove anything statistically on a collective level.
Mark











