"There is not a single historical document from antiquity that provides historiographic evidence for the preferential and systematic use of whole-sign houses or justify the assumption of preferential use of a related whole-sign house system in ancient astrological practice."
is the thesis.
The arguments and documents provided by the WSH-Faith brethren are not , as of now, suitable to falsify that thesis. On the contrary - after the scientific - peer-reviewed paper:
Associate Professor Dr. Martin Gansten – Platikos and moirikos – Ancient Horoscopic Practice in the Light of Vettius Valens’ Anthologies –
https://brill.com/view/journals/ijdp/4/ ... =pdf-63199 –
https://www.lunduniversity.lu.se/lucat/ ... e26362461d
I would like to see a scientific - peer reviewed paper - published by a scientific publisher - trying to falsify
"There is not a single historical document from antiquity that provides historiographic evidence for the preferential and systematic use of whole-sign houses or justify the assumption of preferential use of a related whole-sign house system in ancient astrological practice"
I haven't even seen any attempt to comment on or criticize Prof. Gansten's paper with academic standards. If there is one, please provide a link. - Instead, cancel culture, insults, defamation of character and defamation and out-of-context propaganda. And this fact is epistemologically very well relevant to the overall assessment of the WSH crusade against serious science.
And the same is true for the fact based Presentation by Deborah Houlding
https://vimeo.com/765620082/7d6469fe5b.
And I agree with Dr. Luis Ribeiro
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0A8DCjSaDBA
that we have a substantial problem in the Astrological Community.
The universal lack, with very few exceptions, of the ability to think critically prevents serious discourse from the outset.
And because of that I understand why serious scientists completely block out the cesspool level in the context of contemporary Astrology in social media from their perception and rightly demand academic standards. - In this context, my respect for Prof. Gansten for his effort to answer unserious Approaches seriously.
But this is the zeitgeist we suffer from - The Bolognascenery in European Universities (except Russia) and the US - Option of getting a B.A. in Genderstudies with 58 genders, embracing the idea that men can have babies and the option of changing your gender daily by thought is a significant problem in our societies. We better apply pre - Bologna - Standards. - But instead people in the US get jailed just for
expressing opinions that differ from the mainstream and government propaganda. - The next witch burning also in astrological contexts is already peeking around the corner and I see this in the beginnings of the WSH faith campaign and this context belongs to the overall perception of contemporary history in the context of a absolutist WSH approach that has long been disproved.
For that fact see:
Associate Professor Dr. Martin Gansten – Platikos and moirikos – Ancient Horoscopic Practice in the Light of Vettius Valens’ Anthologies –
https://brill.com/view/journals/ijdp/4/ ... =pdf-63199 - 43 pages, a fully referenced, peer-reviewed scholarly work, critiqued by experts in the field, presented in an academic journal edited by the emminent Michael Lackner and Charles Burnett, and published by the leading international academic publisher, Brill.
And in this context:
My working hypothesis for the earliest use of Houses in the practice of Astrological Delineation in the 1st century CE:
"The first documented house-system in Antiquity is the Quadrant House System of Manilius".
s.Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Hübner - Universität Münster - Die Dodekatropos des Manilius (Manil. 2, 856 - 970) (Abhandlungen der Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur: Geistes- und sozialwissenschaftliche Klasse)
https://www.youtube.com/@kosmologie-mik ... 663/videos
and Whole Sign Houses do simply not exist in Manilius.