Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 8:38 pm
post deleted
Skyscript Astrology Forum
https://www.skylab.build.applab.net/forums/
https://www.skylab.build.applab.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=3159
Hi Sunny Dawn, and thanks for your comments.Sunny Dawn wrote:To understand this line of thought, it is essential to understand the underlying nakshatras, and not just the Western sun signs. Aquarius is primarily make up of the ascetic Uttara Bhadrapada, and the darkly powerful, materialistic, demon-loving Purva Bhadrapada. Both of these nakshatras speak to a side of Rahu's essential nature - Rahu the witch is seen with PB, while Rahu the monk is seen with UB.
Papretis,Sidereal Aquarius consists of the latter part of Dhanista, whole of Satabisha and the three quarters of Purva Bhadrapada. Satabisha is ruled by Rahu that brings proneness to addictions and extremes (this is based on a study that I've made with AstroDatabank, where I studied 60 charts that had three of four planets in Satabisha).
I agree. For me, if there's a monk in jyotish it is Ketu, or more likely, Saturn.I don't see any monk in Rahu, though of course I'm open to proofs to contrary. I think Rahu is mostly a worldly and sensation-oriented, extrovert planet.
Hi Pete,Pete wrote:I have a strong feeling Ketu is ruled by ascetic Saturn and not Mars. It destroys the fruits of material ambition and pulls one towards moksha, kicking and screaming if necessary! There is no straight path with Ketu and whatever planet is touched by it functions in a very strange and unusual way.
Thanks Papretis, that's quite a collection you have there and yes, they do seem to have a "different" look to them. Many of them look lean and somewhat gaunt.Here's pictures about people with Ketu on their Ascendants and they do have a "spare" and often a bit unusual look http://koti.welho.com/jmetsovu/Kuvat/ketu.htm .
Pete wrote:[I'd be looking for an interest in off-beat, metaphysical or occult subjects and a disregard for accepted norms. One can see this in the life of Baudelaire, who had Ketu rising in Leo and the Sun part of a stellium in Pisces in the 8th, but were are such qualities in Queen Elizabeth II, who has Ketu rising in Sagittarius?
Yes, this is probably what they teach in jyotish courses, but it?s not true. For example Martin Gansten, a Swedish astrologer who has made his PhD dissertation about Nadi astrology and who knows both Sanskrit and the historic origins of astrology in East and West, writes on his netsite http://www.martingansten.se/astrologi/a ... toria.htmlSunny Dawn wrote:Pete, not to jump on you, or anything, but your "strong feeling" is no substitute for a system that was carefully observed and validated by roughly 3200 BCE, around the time of The Mahabarata. Western classical astrologers had not yet crawled out of the cradle and figured out how to point at the sky by this date.
To translate this in English:?B?de indiska och v?sterl?ndska ut?vare av indisk astrologi vill kanske just av denna anledning tro att den horoskopiska astrologin har sitt ursprung i Indien, men det faktum att samtliga astrologiska sanskrittexter inneh?ller stora m?ngder tekniska grekiska l?nord visar tydligt att s? inte ?r fallet. Det ?r heller inte korrekt att kalla indisk astrologi ?vedisk?, som ofta g?rs i dag, och det b?r p?pekas att detta spr?kbruk ?r en amerikansk nyskapelse fr?n 1980-talet: det finns ingen horoskopisk astrologi i Veda, och indiska astrologer har sj?lva aldrig tidigare beskrivit sin praktik som vedisk.
Gansten is not a Western astrologer who would be hostile or dismissive to astrology of India, or who would have cultural biases ? he is a jyotishi himself who has simply studied this subject in depth, also in India.?Both Indian and Western practitioners of Indian astrology will probably solely on this ground think that horoscopic astrology has its origins in India, but the fact, that all astrological texts written in Sanskrit contain a lot of technical vocabulary taken straight from Greek, shows that this is not true. Neither it?s correct to call Indian astrology ?Vedic?, like it?s often done today, and it must be pointed out that this usage is an American invention from the 1980?s: there is no horoscopic astrology in Vedas, neither have Indian astrologers ever themselves called their astrology Vedic until now.
Yes, at least Prash Trivedi presents Ardra this way in his book about nakshatras. But this interpretation doesn?t work very well in real charts. Again, I studied 67 charts that have three or more planets in Ardra and as in general with the Air signs, the preponderance is on warmth and moistness (and yes, I?m mixing traditional astrology from East and West here, because it works) ? that is, on sanguine sociability, extraversion, worldliness etc. Some modern jyotishis see Gemini as an intellectual or aloof sign, but that interpretation comes solely from modern tropical Western astrology, and that?s real mixing of two systems. Sidereal Gemini is not like its tropical counterpart.Sunny Dawn wrote:Ardra is research oriented with a probing intellect. It spends a lot of time making careful, penetrating observations. Albert Einstein had an Ardra Moon. The association with "air travel" or anything to do with the heavens is how Rahu manifests here.