Page 2 of 3

Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 8:23 pm
by amzolt
Xanny wrote:
amzolt wrote:First one must know if the person is using the word destiny as a supreme goal they desire or as their Fate.
I have never understood destiny to mean a supreme goal one desires...

Destiny
3) The POWER that predetermines the course of events
The "supreme goal one desires", to me, is the Power that determines the course of events...
Xanny wrote:We live in a dualistic world: Good/Bad, Dark/Light, Yin/Yang etc. Could it be that one's freewill is limited to which of these polarities one chooses to align themselves with? Once chosen, Fate takes over; until the next 'crisis of consciousness (transit) presents an opportunity to re-align oneself (unless of course we have reached the point of no return !!)
:-sk :-cry
What you say makes sense...

Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 9:18 pm
by Xanny
The "supreme goal one desires", to me, is the Power that determines the course of events...
Do you mean that you personally desire the Power which determines the course of events? :-?

Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 9:29 pm
by amzolt
Xanny wrote:
The "supreme goal one desires", to me, is the Power that determines the course of events...
Do you mean that you personally desire the Power which determines the course of events? :-?
No, I mean that any supreme goal one desires is the power that determines the course of events for that person...

The supreme goal is the power...

Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 9:54 pm
by Xanny
Will have to get back to you on that amzolt as it's late here in UK. Appreciate you sharing your ideas, thank you :'

Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 5:00 am
by Deb
I think his illness was more complicated because he was shot in the chest during the civil war. With permanent lung damage he might have been lucky to have lived as long as he did. I also remember reading one of his comments where he talks about how long lived and healthy he might have been if he had not been so immoderate in his lifestyle. I?m sorry I can?t remember where I read that but I?m sure the quote made reference to his smoking ? the reason I remember it is because I was a smoker at that time and understood where he was coming from. I?ll try and find the reference later and add it in if I can.

Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 9:41 am
by Mark
I can?t remember where I read that but I?m sure the quote made reference to his smoking ? the reason I remember it is because I was a smoker at that time and understood where he was coming from.
I didn't know that. I wish I had. Our Association recently organised a workshop run with the noted Culpeper expert Graeme Tobyn. He is a smoker himself and we could have teased him about this. :wink:

I haven't read Culpeper that extensively but when I have dipped in I have enjoyed his writing. I love his eccentric, humour. Now I have learned a bit more on medical astrology from Graeme Tobyn I will hopefully be able to re-read him with more insight into the topic.
I remember it is because I was a smoker at that time
So you are going clean these days? Good for you. The only thing I regret about being a non-smoker is all those interesting chats that seem to happen outside conferences/workshops. I always feel I am missing out on all the really juicy info :D.

Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 12:39 pm
by Deb
Stopped smoking on 7th December 2007. Graeme's book 'Culpeper's Medicine' was a major motivation actually, because it lays out the steps to good health and number one is have a good quality air.
I haven't read Culpeper that extensively
You can dip a little toe in the water with one of this month's updates:

http://www.skyscript.co.uk/astrodiscourse.html - quite a thoughtful piece of work.

Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2009 5:19 pm
by Andrew
You can dip a little toe in the water with one of this month's updates:
Great transcription and annotations.

This article appeared (unattributed) as an appendix in Simmonite's Arcana of Astrology (1890).

Now I know who wrote it. Thank you!

Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 7:01 pm
by Eddy
Andrew wrote:
You can dip a little toe in the water with one of this month's updates:
Great transcription and annotations.

This article appeared (unattributed) as an appendix in Simmonite's Arcana of Astrology (1890).

Now I know who wrote it. Thank you!
This is interesting:
Culpeper's Discourse wrote:Virtue Procreative
The first in order is the Virtue Procreative: for nature regards not only the conservation of
itself, but to beget its like, and conserve in Species.
The seat of this is the Member of Generation, and is governed principally by the influence of
Venus. It is augmented and increased by the strength of Venus, by her Herbs, Roots, Trees,
Minerals, &c. It is diminished and purged by those of Mars, and quite extinguished by those of
Saturn. Observe the hour and Medicines of Venus, to fortify; of Mars, to cleanse this virtue; of
Saturn, to extinguish it.
If I've understood this well, the reproduction organs are meant. It is interesting, for what I usually read is that in such matters Venus is said to be related to female and Mars to male. However here Mars is said to have a negative influence and the gender distinction isn't made.

The book of Simmonite is on the internet
http://books.google.nl/books?id=dYGaQ5J ... =1#PPA2,M1'
The Culpeper part is attributed to a certain 'John Story'. Apart from the fact that the original source wasn't mentioned it is interesting to see how traditional work was passed though like this.

Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 8:34 pm
by Deb
I would be surprised if this discourse was not reproduced or translated from an earlier work, although I?m guessing here.

The point about the ?member of generation? is interesting. I wonder if, by the term Member of Generation, he specifically means the womb rather than the reproductive organs as a whole. I think so, but I?m not sure. It will be good to get some other opinions on this.

Posted: Thu Jun 04, 2009 2:15 pm
by Tom
We'll try to be delicate about this:

I think he is referring to the reproductive organ of the male. I am of this opinion because the the descriptive adjectives used:

"augmented," "increased," "strength," are on the positive side. "Diminished," "purged," and "extinguished" are on the negative side. Maybe it's just my male worldview, but that sounds like the masculine side of things to me, not the womb.

Venus is a bit puzzling, but she is often associated with sex and Mars with energy or the lack of. Also if we want to prepare the male to generate, we do so with Venus things, not Mars things. He's already Mars.

Tom

Posted: Thu Jun 04, 2009 4:10 pm
by Deb
I have some vague recollection of ruling that idea out, so I re-read the document. Now I can't understand why that idea never even occured to me ! :)

Thanks Tom