157 by Ficina I've gone for a Chelsea win anyway by default, 1-0. Apologies for quoting myself but it's the first scoreline I've got right so far this weekend! My 3-1 prediction for Spurs has already gone. Newcastle are 2-1 up Andrew said: I have joined you in going for Everton today. I've actually gone for a 2-0 win to Liverpool. I know this is unlikely unless Spurs fail.... Quote Sun Mar 30, 2008 3:19 pm
158 by Andrew Bevan Got the Spurs match down as the game where something could go wrong, but I still need the draw to stay in the money Newcastle should never have bought that new guy, Owen... http://www.astronor.com Quote Sun Mar 30, 2008 3:28 pm
159 by UBER What's the F**ck!!! If I stake a "big money", then I always lose! ALL things was clear with Liverpool-Everton. Why 1-0? Alexey Quote Sun Mar 30, 2008 5:17 pm
160 by Andrew Bevan The Liverpool game was radical by triplicity, Hr Venus, asc Virgo. Venus, Lady of Hr is sextile the MC. Fortuna is sextile the Sun. This aids the favorite.. Most unhappy! Ficina staked Liverpool!! I think we owe you some congratulations!? http://www.astronor.com Quote Sun Mar 30, 2008 5:28 pm
161 by john Cogratulations to all who got their predictions correct. Why did Ficina go for Liverpool? What now for the antiPOF opp Moon theory. To many reasons to try and dismiss Newcastle, when they were the reasons to choose them! Quote Sun Mar 30, 2008 6:35 pm
162 by Andrew Bevan Results seem very much bo be all over the place. Wonder whether it could have something to do with the most recent syzygy? Would anyone have an opinion on that? John said: To many reasons to try and dismiss Newcastle, when they were the reasons to choose them! Excellent reasoning! http://www.astronor.com Quote Sun Mar 30, 2008 8:50 pm
163 by Gunhilde Heh! Reading your responses to games is nearly as entertaining as the games themselves! Gunhilde Quote Mon Mar 31, 2008 5:27 am
164 by Andrew Bevan It's probably another one of those friendlies with 3 red cards and the referee carried off the pitch on a stretcher... http://www.astronor.com Quote Mon Mar 31, 2008 6:52 am
165 by Ficina Here is my contribution to the post-match "entertainment" 1. The colour method 2. The Moon/Jupiter conjunction Both of these were mentioned beforehand by John and myself. (Please re-read what we said.) Putting these together provides an explanation for all three of the Sunday results. The colour method gives Chelsea, Newcastle and Liverpool the Desc, thereby receiving the benefit of the Moon/Jupiter conjunction. As has been mentioned before, according to JF, Moon conj a signficator is usually final. It certainly was in these games. John's observation about Saturn (L7) receiving Jupiter was key I made a similar point over on Videohero's thread, when I said that the Sun was exaltation ruler of the Desc. I also said that I thought this was forcing the chart to fit the result, but now I'm not so sure. Looking at it another way, Mars received the Sun in the same way that Saturn received Jupiter in yesterday's charts. This is definitely something to look out for in the future. John said: What now for the antiPOF opp Moon theory. I've said before that Moon/POF/ant POF aspects seem to work as supporting testimonies but do not overrule other testimonies. I don't expect any of you to remember this observation since I obviously forgot it myself when analysing the Liverpool game! Quote Mon Mar 31, 2008 9:00 am
166 by Gem Ficina Well done on Liverpool/Everton Two strong testimonies for underdogs according to JF. Moon conjunct Jupiter(he says conjunction is a cut-off point and we don't need to look any further); and Moon opp POF. He gives faves the AC, and since Liverpool are playing at home and odds on faves, it doesn't make sense to me to give them the DC. So, the techniques I employ didn't work on this chart. I'm not sure when to switch to the colour method unless I consistantly use it I got the LOH wrong again(thought it was the Sun) and concluded the chart wasn't radical. I now see it's radical and seen in this perspective, the testimonies may be viewed differently(will re-look at the chart). Last edited by Gem on Mon Mar 31, 2008 9:42 am, edited 3 times in total. Quote Mon Mar 31, 2008 9:15 am
167 by Ficina Gem, Everything you say makes sense and I can't disagree with it. I went for Liverpool purely for football reasons. I thought they would beat Everton. The Big Four can usually be relied upon to win at home, although there have been occasional blips. I think these things have to be taken into consideration sometimes. I'm not sure when to switch to the colour method unless I consistantly use it In view of what I've said in the past regarding use of the colour method, I realise I'm being inconsistent here and am applying more than a little hindsight. However, I'd rather see it as being flexible Quote Mon Mar 31, 2008 11:11 am
168 by Andrew Bevan I continue to turn a blind eye to colours, but please keep up the good work ! http://www.astronor.com Quote Mon Mar 31, 2008 11:16 am