Therese Hamilton wrote:As astrologers understand harmonics, the beginning of the zodiac and signs have everything to do with harmonics as shown by the Astrodienst notes I posted above. What you are doing is a mathematical process which is entirely different from the usual use of harmonics by astrologers.
Therese, which astrologers do you mean? The Hamburg School astrologers, for example, use harmonics as I have shown here and in my work. The Hamburg School uses tropical zodiac and I use sidereal zodiac. That is the only difference between me and the Hamburg School.
The planetary pictures I show have nothing to do with the zodiac sign. When I show a dial with harmonics 16, the difference with the hamburg school is only where Aries point is. All planetary pictures except Aries Point are exactly the same. Of course in the progression or return calculations there are differences because sidereal keys are different from tropical keys. It is also one of the reasons why I do not use tropical zodiacs.
This is why you are getting very little feedback to your work.
How do you know that I don't get much feedback ?
Have you read my e-mails ?
Do you know if some professional astrologers and astrology teachers have asked me for advice? Do you know if I am asked by professional astrologers and astrology teachers to correct their birth time ?
The reason I get little fedback here in Skyscript is for many other reasons which I will not go into publicly here because I do not want to offend anyone. That's why from now on I won't make any new publications when I discover something new, because there is still too much to discover, as you know.
I will also not answer any questions about my method from now on. Those who want to learn can learn from my works, because I have explained enough there for those who are intelligent enough. I have also answered many questions here, which almost no astrolger does.
I have seen in astrology forums that astrologers, or let's say those who call themselves astrologers, do not believe themselves that astrology is a very exact science and that the egos of astrologers are more important than astrology. Therefore, astrological progress will be very very slow than I think. One could almost say that the biggest obstacle in front of astrology are the astrologers themselves, because they have very big egos.
A mathematical abstraction apart from the zodiac and signs isn't how astrologers perceive and practice astrology. Abstractions are of no help in the counseling situation or in the basic understanding of an individual.
Firstly, I am not a professional astrologer. Therefore, I am not interested in whether the professional astrologers can give any advice with my system or not.
Secondly, when I write ; it is a cancer ; it is a suicide ; it is a heart disease and so on, these are not abstractions.
If I write SU = VE/MN is marriage ; is it an abstraction ?
If I write for Elizabeth II ; because of inflammatory disease, her condition is critical even fatal and one must take all measures, be prepared for everything. And do I also give the time frames for this. Is it abstract for you ?
This is where astrology is today.
It is not astrology where today stands. It is astrology where yesterday stood in the Middle Ages. You are confusing Vedic D-charts with the harmonics of the Hamburg school.
Maybe some time in the future it will be possible to punch birth data into a computer, and a printout will emerge listing various (for example) health conditions to be aware of such as cancer or autism, but we are very far from that possibility today.
Although I have given over 350 examples of cancer in my work and many others here, you write something as if my work does not exist. As if the diagnosis of cancer with astrology is in the future.
