25 by UBER john wrote:weren't Nottm F 'odds-on'? Difference of teams in First Division is 2 points, and Nottm is lower. IMHO, need more advantage for application of Frawley POF rules However, guests score 0-1 Wow! it turned out, that I staked on them ... and on draw Last edited by UBER on Tue Mar 04, 2008 9:54 am, edited 1 time in total. Alexey Quote Mon Mar 03, 2008 9:23 pm
26 by john However is POS still at 16 Leo opposite Mercury/Venus? If so, how does this link with the Napoli result? And the conclusions from the game tonight are? Quote Mon Mar 03, 2008 10:13 pm
27 by Andrew Bevan Well, that first goal from LeHavre was certainly made void. 4-1 to Troyes. What a turn-around Oh well, Carlisle. Other things than the VOC Moon seem to have been most important Thumbs up to Ficinia and UBER http://www.astronor.com Quote Mon Mar 03, 2008 10:54 pm
28 by Ficina Antiscial aspects are notoriously unreliable but it would seem in this case that Moon square ant Saturn was enough for Carlisle to win. As UBER pointed out, the teams were very close in the league table and it's difficult to understand why the bookies made Forest such a strong favourite. Venus is separating from opp PoF so I wouldn't count it. However, it appeared to work in the Napoli/Inter game Quote Mon Mar 03, 2008 11:02 pm
29 by john Five weekend matches, four in the FA Cup and one in the Premier, that have individual kick-off times. Man U Chelsea Mboro/Cardiff-draw Arsenal Bristol R Quote Sat Mar 08, 2008 7:55 am
30 by UBER Inter Milan vs Reggina 8-03-2008 17-00 GMT Milan Clearly Inter is Favorite. Me L1 +8 Ju L7 +19 Moon oppose POF (-F) L5 in 12 house (-F) AntiJU on IC (+U) DRAW Alexey Quote Sat Mar 08, 2008 3:54 pm
31 by yuzuru Hi, using the time you gave I got an 15Virgo39 ASC Moon is not opposing fortuna, cause they are not in opposing signs... but Fortuna is antiscia Moon ! Strong testimony for the favorites Meu blog de astrologia (em portugues) http://yuzuru.wordpress.com My blog of astrology (in english) http://episthemologie.wordpress.com Quote Sat Mar 08, 2008 4:41 pm
32 by UBER Yes yuzuru you are right Silly question, and isn't Part of Spirit conj with Saturn testimony for underdog? Alexey Quote Sat Mar 08, 2008 8:50 pm
33 by Andrew Bevan Did anyone predict the defeat of ManU and Chelsea yesterday? It appears to me that the results of these contests should have been predicted. Does anyone have a comment? http://www.astronor.com Quote Sun Mar 09, 2008 1:41 pm
34 by UBER Bayer 04 Leverkusen vs Hannover 96 09-08-2008 Leverkusen 17-00 GMT (exact time because of punctual Germany) Bayer's favorite but "Color method" points that Hannover should be on ASC. For DSC: AntiL7 lays on IC PoF opposes MOON AntiPoF on DSC ENOUGH? I Bet on Hannover with handicap +1 because another match at same time without strong favorite Alexey Quote Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:40 pm
35 by Ficina Did anyone predict the defeat of ManU and Chelsea yesterday? Or the defeat of Middlesbrough today? Like John, I thought it would be a draw or failing that, a default win for the odds-on Prem side. It appears to me that the results of these contests should have been predicted. Should have been? Well, I don't know how, but here's some hindsight observations. ManU/Portsmouth. Moon conj MC favours the Asc team but who are they? ManU at home and odds-on faves would give them Asc, but colourwise it would be Portsmouth. Colour method wins. Barnsley/Chelsea. Before the game I noted Moon conj antiscion PoF which would favour Chelsea, odds-on faves. The game kicked off two minutes late, by which time this aspect was separating so didn't count. No other testimonies, so I've no explanation for Barnsley's brilliant victory. The close applying Sun/Uranus conjunction could be seen as a general indicator on the day of shocks, upsets and the unexpected. These planets were 4 degrees from the Desc in the Barnsley game, but I really don't think I would have considered this a sufficient testimony beforehand. Quote Sun Mar 09, 2008 4:21 pm
36 by Andrew Bevan It appears to me that the results of these contests should have been predicted. I said 'Should have been, Ficina' because the matches appear to have possessed all those qualities required to prove them fit for prediction. When major upsets in the outfall of results occur, like in these instances, I am suprized that we are not there. Apart from that, I agree with everything you say. http://www.astronor.com Quote Sun Mar 09, 2008 5:50 pm