The tally so far...

Chart 1 (2)

Chart 2 (5)

Chart 3 (1)

So the majority seem to favour chart 2 so far. If you haven't posted yet what do you think?

Mark

james_m wrote:for those who like the way the 17th century monk did things..

Thanks fot the tribute to Placidus, james.

Johannes

thanks johannes!

i was hoping you would explain which chart you thought the actor was giving a placidian rationale for it too! what am i left to think otherwise? LOL - james

James_M wrote:

I was hoping you would explain which chart you thought the actor was giving a placidian rationale for it too!

Me too! Come on Johannes (+ Nixx). Now you have your preferred Placidean houses displayed what is stopping you both getting involved in the chart analysis? You guys do do natal astrology right?

Mark

Mark wrote:Nixx-does psychological astrology have anything to tell us about what chart the actor is likely to be?

Good question. Knowing if the actor was good or rubbish, hates it or loves it, might help, than again.......

I was waiting for divine inspiration, somewhat ironically.

I reckon the Psycho's might go for 2 as well as it has the 1st/3rd quadrant dynamic they might expect for actors, re the exploring of what is the I and what is the You, if you follow. Like you , albeit for different reasons, I would expect more depth here because the Moon is in the 8th no fluff house, wide conjunct to Pluto and the Sun is conjunct Saturn so a responsible if not dour, as in Capricorn, vibe which might come across verbally with Mercury in the mix also.

Venus in Sag in the 12th. I see this as a glamorous placement, and Sag is my sign for actors, extroverted/mutable and Venus planet for actors. The trine to the Moon should help the person feel comfortable exploring human relationships and it squares Neptune (film) which could be a motivator as well.

'Modern' cook book wise I reckon the 3rd chart steps up more overtly with a more public profile SUN/MER/MC dynamic and pleasure seeking Moon in the 5th. Actors tend not to be selfless servants of society in my experience, or this is not their primary motivation. Gemini as well which is fluff, as we all know!

Trouble is with this one, as I see it, is the first chart has Leo rising and a rising Moon if the time is a bit out, i.e. notice me , and notice me often . Also the SUN/NEP/MER conjunction could suggest someone who ends up speaking in glamorous settings. But 4th house?

Often with these 3 chart guesses one stinks and can be discarded, but, like I think Damon said earlier, none being correct would shock me this time around.

I give up and will pluck for 2 as well, at this stage of the game I ought to stick with the Psychos, if I am!

I think this is the third test in a row now you've anticipated my choice using different (mostly) horoscopics before I've even made it

Sometimes the crowd is wrong,so I stick to 1 and 2 as second choice

Damon wrote:

Sometimes the crowd is wrong,so I stick to 1 and 2 as second choice

Indeed and all the more Kudos to you Damon if your right. Having said that I think chart 1 is least likely to be a public performer. I suspect chart 1 was a writer and most likely lived out their Lunar Leonine drama through that medium.

If I am wrong and its chart 1 I am going to eat my wooly christmas hat.
Mark

Mark wrote:Damon wrote:

Sometimes the crowd is wrong,so I stick to 1 and 2 as second choice

Indeed and all the more Kudos to you Damon if your right. Having said that I think chart 1 is least likely to be a public performer. I suspect chart 1 was a writer and lived out their Lunar Leonine drama through that medium.

If I am wrong and its chart 1 I am going to eat my wooly christmas hat.

Mark

An I ll eat my words and wash them down with grog to forget

Damon,

Just a question that I am curious about. On the mundane forum you have made a few posts using the sidereal zodiac (Krishnamurti ayanamsa) yet here you seem to be judging the charts tropically? For example you describe the ASC and Moon in chart 1 as Leo yet sidereally they are in Cancer:???:

Mark

Mark wrote:Damon,

Just a question that I am curious about. On the mundane forum you have made a few posts using the sidereal zodiac (Krishnamurti ayanamsa) yet here you seem to be judging the charts tropically? For example you describe the ASC and Moon in chart 1 as Leo yet sidereally they are in Cancer:???:

Mark

I dont use Sideral. Samva group uses it aparently with success but not me at least not yet

Thanks for the clarification. You have obviously been presenting a lot of their information. I dont know if you are aware but it basically looks like its your own work the way you have presented it. Anyway, I dont want to distract this thread any further.

Mark

Hello
I've posted my guess in the sidereal forum, charts kindly posted by James. Promise I didn't look at any tropical answers first, but I now see I have a few heavyweights rooting for the same chart!
Graham