If you now ask yourself what concrete statement you have to prove or disprove, then the modern astrologers are not much different from the local users. Because on much more than that there is anything to astrology. you can't agree. What now?

Anyone who has read and reflected on my monologue so far must be aware that you cannot prove astrology as you have done so far, but exactly the other way around.

You look for a situation that is as energetically as similar as possible and analyze their horoscopes for astrological circumstances that deviate very, very clearly from the usual probability. What is clear?

To put it simply: A horoscope is divided into 360 sections by the ascendant. Then it is determined in which section the ascendants of the events to be examined are located. The number of events examined determines how high the probability is that certain ascendant clusters will be found in one of these 360 sections.

Hello to all those who are still reading and thinking along. The following shows a rudimentarily simple probability-theoretical pattern.

Let's hypothetically assume that we have 100 horoscopes with similar sporting events and we reflect the ascendants of these events on a sample horoscope, which we divide into 360 equal sections.

We have to reflect what equal sections mean because the division in degrees sounds not the same like division in time. In europe one minute in the ascendant of leo is longer than one minute in aries.

If you divide it into 360 sections and 100 events, it breaks down as follows (statistically speaking):

Roundedly, 273 of the 360 field sections are occupied 0 times, 76 sections are occupied once, 11 sections are occupied twice, 3 sections are occupied 3 times, 0.3 sections are occupied four times.

This means that it only happens on average in 4 times 100 horoscopes that one of these 360 ​​sections is used at least 4 times. The probability here is 1:4.

I first examined everything, not only the ascendant, but also the planets in the houses and signs, although of course it is no longer very expedient in the signs from Uranus onwards if you examine a period of about 60 years, because the orbit of Uranus lasts more than 80 years.

Jakob,

Consider human behavior as well.
They don't play a soccer game in the middle of the night. And it is seasonal.
I can predict that the Sun is always in Gemini for the Champions Festival taking place across central London between Thursday 30 May and Sunday 2 June.
Same would apply with births. If doctors only work from 9 to 5, the probability of children born during daytime increases.

Ouranos

There can be no statement in the style of "Mars in Leo is this or that", because the world does not only consist of a countable set of facts, but that would be the logical consequence.

I chose the situation that in a soccer match one team was leading shortly before the end, but then the tide was turned at short notice and the other team still won the game.

In the astrological analysis, I found two statistical anomalies, a rather weak one with a significantly frequent position of Saturn and an extreme one with the position of the ascendant to a certain degree.

The probability of such an accumulation is 1:2000.

Ouranos wrote: Thu May 30, 2024 10:33 am Jakob,

Consider human behavior as well.
They don't play a soccer game in the middle of the night. And it is seasonal.
I can predict that the Sun is always in Gemini for the Champions Festival taking place across central London between Thursday 30 May and Sunday 2 June.
Same would apply with births. If doctors only work from 9 to 5, the probability of children born during daytime increases.

Ouranos

I did, Ouranos.Think about it: I found a certain Ascendant degree accumulated, although in my study example it was only at the end of the game in a certain number of games. Most matches in Europe take place at the same time of day, so the AC shifts over the course of the season. That in europe in June it ist more warm than in december, thats true, but ist not misused in my stytistics. Jakob

The point is, Ouranos, that the planets in the signs showed no statistical abnormalities at all.

Group fate point Jupiter Uranus means: the quantum leap, lucky constellation, because often a sudden turn in a hopeless situation.