37 by aquirata Pipedreamer, Could you point me to the relevant post so I can post an intelligent reply? Thanks, Peter Quote Tue Dec 04, 2007 7:26 pm
38 by pipedreamer Oh Erudite One, The post is headed "Horse Racing 2007-8". Regards, P. Quote Wed Dec 05, 2007 12:51 pm
39 by aquirata Pipedreamer, If you're referring to your brief analysis of the 3:30 Newcastle on Saturday (Dec 1), then the point you are making is not relevant in this context. Here is why. The race went off at 3:32 pm, at which point Mercury Lord 1 was 7.5 degrees from the Descendant. Frawley specifically says to allow only 2-3 degrees off the angles. So Lord 1 is not indicating anything in the chart. If you add the 4 minutes it took to run the race, the situation is even worse because the separation becomes nearly 9 degrees. In fact there are very clear indications in this chart against the favourite and nothing for it. Nothing surprising in the result from an astrological perspective. Peter Quote Wed Dec 05, 2007 1:34 pm
40 by pipedreamer Peter, You appear annoyed and I find your reply rather abrupt. Brevity spares some people boredom. You have made an assumption I do not feel inclined to explain - so please go on missing the point. P. Quote Wed Dec 05, 2007 6:36 pm
41 by aquirata Not annoyed at all, Pipedreamer, and my reply was not meant to be abrupt. If you choose not to carry on a discussion you started, that's your prerogative. I'll just go on being ignorant of your point. Peter Quote Wed Dec 05, 2007 6:54 pm