Perhaps some limited consensus
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 2:36 pm
Good afternoon,
Upon Mr Mark's (Moderator) suggestion, i have read this thread. Perhaps the following items will be found useful:
The following items might perhaps assist in reflection and clarification:
lihin
Upon Mr Mark's (Moderator) suggestion, i have read this thread. Perhaps the following items will be found useful:
- 1. There appears to be consensus that the astronomical zodiac is composed of unequal constellations, the borders, names, attributes of which have differed historically and amongst cultures.
2. There also seems to be consensus that equal-sign 'sidereal' zodiacs, many of which have been proposed and are used, pegged to some astronomical phenomenon (by which criteria?), do not change from one hemisphere to the other.
3. Consensus is widespread that tropical and polar zones of both hemispheres exhibit climatic patterns somewhat different from the temperate zones in between.
4. The apparent difficulties and questions thus appear restricted to the applicability of the tropical equal-sign zodiac of the northern hemisphere to the southern hemisphere (and vice-versa?), aggravated in tropical zones near the equator.
The following items might perhaps assist in reflection and clarification:
- A. As far as i know, Klaudios Ptolomaios used neither the word nor the concept of 'archetype' in his Tetrabiblos, not surprising in view of his apparently Aristotelian philosophical orientation.
B. The polar zones exhibit extremes of light and darkness and of temperatures in lieu of 'seasons' in the temperate zones. Tropical zones usually exhibit wet and dry 'seasons' corresponding to the yearly solar declination cycle.
C. A lady from Quito, Ecuador, told me that when one takes a boat excursion to the exact equator, one can see the waters on one side of the boat (southern hemisphere) swirling clockwise, on the other side (northern hemisphere) swirling counter-clockwise when the boat is stopped.
D. In Ptolemy's Tetrabiblos, Book I, Section 2, That Knowledge by Astronomical Means is Attainable, and How Far, we read (translation by Prof. Frank Robbin):
Quite remarkable, 'modern' sounding statements from an ancient Hellenistic astronomer / astrologer!"... For differences of seed exert a very great influence on the special traits of the genus, since, if the ambient and the horizon are the same, each seed prevails to express in general its own form, for example, man, horse, and so forth; and the places of birth bring about no small variation in what is produced. For if the seed is generically the same, human for example, and the condition of the ambient the same, those who are born differ much, both in body and soul, with the difference of countries. 17 In addition to this, all aforesaid conditions being equal, rearing and customs contribute to influence the particular way in which a life is lived. ..." (bold emphasis added)
One reads often that 'the tropical zodiac of the northern hemisphere seems to work astrologically in the southern one'. Of course there are phenomena of suggestion, auto-suggestion and the like to which astrologers and their clients are scarcely immune. Moreover, many, probably most of the current inhabitants of the southern hemisphere originated in the northern one at most a few centuries ago. Since intermarriage amongst colonising and indigenous peoples has apparently been more the exception than the rule and colonists have mostly maintained their prior languages, religions, diets, etc., might they still be more 'in tune' to cosmic rhythms experienced in their northern hemisphere of origin? When one considers that the Old Stone Age was about 99 % of human history to date, deeply 'going native' ex. gr. in Australia might take quite some time.
E. Since Ptolemy purposely and deliberately separated astrological signs from constellations in all but names (retrospectively, perhaps to avoid confusion it might have been better to choose different names as well), we can only seek to investigate and observe by diligent research to what extent, if at all, the often climatological and geographical elements of his astrological system basically hold true like the klimata 'reversed' in direction for the southern hemisphere. For such research, of main interest primarily to astrologers practising in the southern hemisphere, may i suggest locations not too far from the 45th geographic parallel of southern latitude?
F. In this thread little attention appears hitherto to have been paid to primary diurnal motion essential in heliacal phenomena and in the Hellenistic prediction techniques of primary directions. Unless i am severely mistaken, which is always possible, Helios rises in the East and sets the West in S?o Paulo, Brazil, like in Alexandria, Egypt.
G. Serious modern German astrologers, for example Reinhold Ebertin, have been careful to state that the tropical zodiac used is for the northern hemisphere.
lihin


