Japanese authorities have raised the severity rating of their nuclear crisis to the highest level, seven. The decision reflects the total release of radiation at the damaged Fukushima Daiichi power plant, which is ongoing, rather than a sudden deterioration.

Level seven previously only applied to the 1986 Chernobyl disaster, where 10 times as much radiation was emitted.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-13045341

Two Earthquakes in Nevada the last week that could be a warning of tension in the region:

From the USGS:
Region: NEVADA
Geographic coordinates 38.400N, 118.716W
Magnitude: 4.6 Ml, Depth: 0 km
Universal Time (UTC): 17 Apr 2011 00:45:37
Time near the Epicenter: 16 Apr 2011 17:45:37

Region: NEVADA
Geographic coordinates: 38.378N, 118.739W
Magnitude: 4.5 Mw, Depth: 0 km
Universal Time (UTC): 13 Apr 2011 22:10:07
Time near the Epicenter: 13 Apr 2011 15:10:07

Here is a good link if anyone wants to monitor online activity in the area:
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqscanv/

Well, I have to post a word to verify that there as no major Earthquake on April 25.-27. either in San Francisco or in any other place of the world. There was 6,2 Richter EQ in Indonesia on April 24. but that does NOT agree with anything sought at this point in time. Earthquakes of mag 6 are not infrequent in this area - so the phenomena has no significance. There was a 5,6 Richter Earthquake in the Gulf of California on April 26. but this also misses its mark but in terms of size/significance/placement as it occurred 10? East and 10? South of the specified target. So it doesn't work out. OK - so we are sat back with is some good news, i.e. 'No tragic happenings in San Francisco' - and frustration... What happened, why didn't it happen, what's the point and what does this do for astrology, etc?

Unfortunately, I don't have the time or capacity to give a full answer at this point in time, except that a law of alternating models does occur. In my mind, everything was in place - and fibonacci mathematics agreed with the symmetry. So these observations should be presented for scrutiny. Or else we are stumped and at a standstill. I still need time to work it all through, but in terms of fibonacci there is still an option of being on track but with the need of reversing the fractions. This would mean that 77-80 days is not the 0.618 fraction of the equation but the 0.382. This would again mean that the entire motion from Dec.21. 2010 is not 125 days but 125+80 days = 205 days leading up to a day in the middle of July. But this is different puzzle and it is not sure that the either the solar eclipse of July 1. or June 1., or the lunar eclipse of June 15. or of the full Moon on July 15., gives evidence to the same. Intuitively I would inspect the chart for the Solar eclipse on June 1. for clues, since there is a 45 day fraction from this date and forward to the Full Moon of July 15. or 47 days up to July 17., which is 205 days from the lunar eclipse of Dec 21. 2010.

My frustration is that I believe astrology is close to being able to proving its usefulness in picking up, forewarning and monitoring such events. As it is, I am back to a prediction on the winner of Eurovision 2011, which really has no significance what so ever - in the importance of things....

Just a last word on the Astro*Cartography charts; these should be regarded as 3-dimension time/space cubes. With this I mean that to use this tool efficiently it is important not to look at one chart on its own, but how emphasis develops from one chart to the next over a period of time. Then you have your thread and a better understanding of developments.

Here is the Astro*Cartography chart that passes through to luanr eclipse of June 15. 2011. As it can be seen in this chart, the eclipsed Moon is located on the lower Midheavan of San Francisco. This lunar eclipse occurs 6 lunar months, or half a fibonacci year (12 lunations), after the introductory lunar eclipse chart of Dec 21. 2010.

Astro*Cartography Lunar Eclipse June 15. 2011 Summer 2011 is particular by the fact that it includes two partial eclipses of the Sun and a total eclipse of the Moon. The total lunar eclipse of June 15. occurs so close to the Moon's nodes that this means we experience a prolonged eclipse of the Moon as the Luna moves throught the centre of the Earth's total shadow.

As admitted in the previous post, the importance of the 45? angle progression was not demonstrated from the 8,8-9,0 Ricther earthquake that occurred in Japan on March 11. and forward to April 25, which also would have revealed a neat fibonnaci relationship between the two intervals when compared with the initiating eclipse Dec 21. 2010. So there was an increased theoretical chance of such an event occurring. Chart are highlighting the East coast of the United States. As I tried to explained earlier, it is still be valuable to monitor this area with attention - with caution - to see if we can figure out what is going on and when it may happen. The fiboncacci fractions may be reversed where the distance from Dec 21.2010 to March 11.2011 is an expression of 0.382 of the equation rather than 0.618.

In the end we are not attempting to predict an earthquake that may cause the end of the world and death and doom to everyone and all, but we are trying to uncover some rational cycle or pattern in nature that might help improve our state of preparedness. This is both a challenge and a key toward proving the usefulness of astrology.