Posted: Sat Jul 24, 2010 4:12 pm
Hello Margherita,The text I mentioned it is not on fixed stars, it's a story of the world creation. I mentioned just because it is example of the thema mundi where planets are considered in their exaltation (ie this is not the Egyptian version).
Yes I know what the Thema Mundi is.
This chart of exaltations, which looks like a Persian variant of the Thema Mundi, is according to Pingree a chart for the nativity of Gayomart, who is the mythical prototype and progenitor of humanity in the Zoroastrian creation story. This owes it origin not to the Greek Thema Mundi (based on domicile rulers) but rather a separate Indian horoscopic tradition known as the Mahapurusa (Great Man) in which all the planets are at their exaltations [except Mercury].
Here is a quote from Pingree's article which another member kindly provided:
We had a discussion on the astrology of the Greater Bundahishn and other Avestan texts a couple of years ago which members might find useful as Gavin White gave some useful suggestions for further study.''Unfortunately, little of an astrological nature survives in Pahlavi itself; scientific texts in general were not preserved by those Zoroastroians who survived the Muslim invasions and resisted conversion in Iran or who fled to the west coast of India. The principle extant passage that is relevant is found in the fifth and sixth chapters of the Bundahishn in which the nativity of Gayomart is discussed.
"In this horoscope the ascendant was in 19 Cancer with Tishtar or Sirius... Each of the planets was in its balist or exaltation save for Mercury, whose exaltation, Virgo, is removed from the Sun's, Aries, by more than its maximum elongation; this planet, therefore, was placed with Venus in the latter's exaltation and its own dejection, Pisces. The position of the ascendant is undoubtedly a reflection of an attempt to arrive at a noon-epoch for the creation with the Sun in its Greek exaltation, 19 Aries (the Sun's Indian exaltation is 9 degrees before this)?
"This Sasanian horoscope is quite different from the normal Greek thema mundi, with which it has been compared. The Hermetic thema is based on the doctrine of the planetary domiciles: the Sun, Jupiter, Mars, and Venus are at 15 degrees of their masculine domiciles, the Moon, Saturn, and Mercury at 15 degrees of their feminine domiciles, and the ascendant at 15 Cancer. Rather, it is the Indian horoscope of a mahapurusa (great man) in which all the planets are at their exaltations [except Mercury].
"The earliest occurrence of this mahapurusayoga in India is in the Yavanajataka composed by Sphujidhvaja in 269/70; elements of this text are independently known to have been familiar to Sasanian astrologers. But it has already been noted that the Greek exaltation of the Sun has been used rather than the Indian; this is also true of the exaltations of the lunar nodes, and a Byzantine version of this Zoroastrian horoscope, more complete than the Bundahishn's, indicates that all of the exaltations were taken from a Greek rather than from an Indian source.
"The other astrological elements in the Bundahishn are equally a mixture of Indian and Greek materials?"
http://skyscript.co.uk/forums/viewtopic ... +astrology
Of course not.My source is not Brady.
I wasn't actually. But I'm sure you think its Rome.But if you are asking me if I believe that Egypt (or Babylonia) was the mother of all the civilization, well I don't believe.
Mark