Linchi wrote:
I will soon prepare and post a few examples about true vs mean node.
I am very much looking forward to this as I've been wanting to see real support for one node or the other, although we now know that the so-called "true" node isn't really any more true than the mean node.
A good place for this discussion would be a new topic on the Sidereal part of the forum as the topic here is mainly for notices, news and links.
I do think we're well into the most accurate ayanamsa ball park with Krishnamurti and Richard Houck's ayanamsa which is very close to Krishnamurti. We can see this by work with the varga charts. There are many cases when a planet just barely makes it into another sign or just misses the next sign when using the Krishnamurti ayanamsa. It's easy to mentally place those planets in varga signs with Lahiri for comparison. I haven't found that the Fagan-Bradley ayanamsa even comes close using varga (divisional) charts.
Linchi, I'm definitely confused about your use of harmonics, when and why you use a particular harmonic, etc. Also there is very little explanation in a preface to the many illustrated charts to explain what you are doing. This is why I suggest a separate topic for discussion and questions regarding your suicide research.