Skyscript Astrology Forum

Alfred Witte's Hades and Conspiracy


Used :

1- Krishnamurti Ayanamsa : 23°45'56" for Year 2000.
Speed of precession is 50.2388475.
2- Mean Node
3- Harmonic 16 and 256
4- Zet Astrology Software : I used Nova Chartwheels where the harmonics were not
clearly visible because of the missing harmonic points in the circle.
5- Secondary Progression : 1 sidereal day = 1 sidereal year


https://ia801404.us.archive.org/28/item ... piracy.pdf

Intriguing linchi.

linchi wrote:
Alfred Witte's Hades and Conspiracy.

I totally agree with you linchi, Witte was an outstanding/genus astrologer but nowhere do I see in Witte's masterpiece “Rules for Planetary Pictures??? did he mention the word “Conspiracy??? associated with Hades. Indeed Hades is a very malefic factor with Witte's brilliant work.

FWIW, I have proven to myself the USA Boyd Chart (Declaration of War against Britain) is a most important chart for USA:

Boyd's USA Chart: July 6 1775 11:00 AM LMT; Philadelphia, Pa: 39N57:08; 075W09:51

Using the great but simple predictive tool of Solar Arcs (individual arc for time of year—July 6th), we see Solar Arc Hades 90 r Saturn. This Solar Arc of course happens every 90 years with 0,90,180 aspects (Great Depression 90 years ago-1930). Quoting Witte word for word in his Rules for Planetary Pictures, he states:

Melancholy. Trouble. Sadness. The alien. Refugees. Serious obstacles. Severe sickness or unemployment of long duration. Enemies. Enmity. Serious loss. Prison. Epidemics. Illness restrictions. Ugly habits. Matters that are put off or never finished.

The USA Labor Department reports there are 48 million Americans unemployed.

linchi, I am most interested in your work, particular with the 16 harmonic. I am somewhat an amateur when id comes to detailed dial work with Witte's Uranian Astrology system. If you happen to see any future important configuration with Boyd's chart with your work, please post.

Steve

Thanks for your comment SteveS, it's very nice of you.

It is true that Alfred Witte developed astrology with his discoveries e.g. Solar Arcs, planetary pictures and Transneptunian planets .
Planetary pictures and Transneptunian planets are very little known except in Germany. But I think it is very important that we can use them to better understand the events astrologically.

It is also true that the word "Conspiracy" in "Rules for Planetary Pictures" is not associated with Hades.

What I refer to in my Work is the book "Lexicon for Planetary Pictures". This book was first printed in 1957. In this book you can easily find the keywords and corresponding planetary pictures like in a dictionary. I don't know whether it was translated into English. If you are interested, you can ask here.

https://www.witte-verlag.com/ueber-uns.html

SteveS wrote: Using the great but simple predictive tool of Solar Arcs (individual arc for time of year—July 6th), we see Solar Arc Hades 90 r Saturn. This Solar Arc of course happens every 90 years with 0,90,180 aspects (Great Depression 90 years ago-1930)

I call them (0,90, 180, 360 ) the Harmonic-years. You can also take 45 , 22.5 and 11.25 for the shorter time windows. It can vary for each individual solar arcs.

linchi, I am most interested in your work, particular with the 16 harmonic. I am somewhat an amateur when id comes to detailed dial work with Witte's Uranian Astrology system.

When working with the dial and planetary pictures the biggest problem is software, because the software do not show so clearly, so you can see all the planetary pictures. You have to search and that is intensive work. So I wrote in my work "Deception" what kind of software we need.

If you happen to see any future important configuration with Boyd's chart with your work, please post.

Two years ago, I worked very little with Richard Houck`s USA Chart:
June 19, 1776 11:54:46 AM LMT Philadelphia, PA

I've never worked with Boyd's chart before. I would like to look at Boyd's chart in the future.

linchi

linchi wrote:

Planetary pictures and Transneptunian planets are very little known except in Germany. But I think it is very important that we can use them to better understand the events astrologically.

I totally agree linchi! I have only been investigating the TNPs in the last month, but I can already see certain TNPs explain to me with planetary pictures in my natal chart for a couple major life events. I beginning to see/understand why the Hamburg School is important for investigating Natal and Mundane Charts.

linchi wrote:

What I refer to in my Work is the book "Lexicon for Planetary Pictures". This book was first printed in 1957. In this book you can easily find the keywords and corresponding planetary pictures like in a dictionary. I don't know whether it was translated into English. If you are interested, you can ask here.

As of 2017 “Lexicon??? was not in English print, I would love to have an English translation. But I will ask Michael Feist at your link (thanks), since I have been communicating with him by e-mail the last couple of weeks.

linchi wrote:

When working with the dial and planetary pictures the biggest problem is software, because the software do not show so clearly, so you can see all the planetary pictures. You have to search and that is intensive work. So I wrote in my work "Deception" what kind of software we need.

I understand exactly where you are coming from linchi! Have you worked with Michael Feist's specialized Uranian Program---AstrologicPC? If so, your opinions? I will be sure to read your “Deception??? work. It takes practice and experience working with dials—so since I have neither working with Dials, I am trying to figure out how to properly view the Uranian system with Software.

linchi wrote:

I've never worked with Boyd's chart before. I would like to look at Boyd's chart in the future.

I will try to start a thread on the Boyd Chart pointing out this chart is picking-up major historical events with its Solar Arc angles. It is also picking-up outstanding incidents with Sidereal Lunar Returns and a couple of Sidereal Solar Returns. I can't wait to investigate this chart further with Uranian system. I am 73 and wish I had discovered Uranian astrology 38 years ago when I first started my journey with Astrology.

Looking forward to communicating with you more with our common interests.

I don't have Michael Feist's astrology program.I don't think his program could be an option for me because I work with sidereal zodiac and user progression rates for secondary and tertiary progressions. If you work with Uranian System, an astrology program should be such that the planet pictures can be created visually and as a list in addition to the sidereal settings.

Today's astrology programs missing one or the other features, so you use necessarily several programs. Nova Chartwheels would be a good option, if it would not be so user unfriendly and the returns and progressions could be displayed as bi-wheel.

I would be happy to communicate with you and try to answer if you have any questions about the Uranian system.

linchi wrote:

I don't have Michael Feist's astrology program. I don't think his program could be an option for me because I work with sidereal zodiac and user progression rates for secondary and tertiary progressions.

I understand linchi, I too work in the Sidereal Zodiac. But, I think I may try this program out for possible short cuts to get fast key word phases for Witte's Planetary Pictures. I will let you know if it helps me with my learning curve for Uranian Astrology.

linchi wrote:

Today's astrology programs missing one or the other features, so you use necessarily several programs. 

Exactly! I have 4 different programs now to help me with quick(er) technique pattern recognition for my practice.

linchi wrote:

I would be happy to communicate with you and try to answer if you have any questions about the Uranian system.

Thanks linchi. Are you familiar with the Uranian technique for Equal Distancing with Solar Arcs for a 2-4 months time frame? In the meantime, to help you understand where I am with Uranian Astrology, about 2 weeks ago a Topic for Uranian was started in another Sidereal forum here:

https://www.solunars.com/viewtopic.php?f=55&t=4276

Its a Sidereal Astrology forum—don't know if you are interested but would love for you to hang out at times on this forum.

SteveS wrote: But, I think I may try this program out for possible short cuts to get fast key word phases for Witte's Planetary Pictures. I will let you know if it helps me with my learning curve for Uranian Astrology.

It is of course logical to use such a program when the learning process is still in the beginning.

Are you familiar with the Uranian technique for Equal Distancing with Solar Arcs for a 2-4 months time frame?

With the Solar Arcs you can't make precise predictions, because you usually use at most harmonic 16. But with the transits to the planetary picture for the event could be determined nearly the exact day. I use higher harmonics than the Uranian astrologers and I do not use solar arcs.To determine an event-year I use solar, for the month lunar return, for the week transiting moon phases and for the day secondary progressions with higher harmonics. Even determining the hour of the event is theoretically possible with secondary and tertiary progressions with higher harmonics. My techniques are different from conventional Uranian system.

In the meantime, to help you understand where I am with Uranian Astrology, about 2 weeks ago a Topic for Uranian was started in another Sidereal forum here:

https://www.solunars.com/viewtopic.php?f=55&t=4276

I'd like to take a look at

Its a Sidereal Astrology forum—don't know if you are interested but would love for you to hang out at times on this forum.

Thank you for the invitation, if I had the time, I would drop by from time to time.

linchi wrote:

It is of course logical to use such a program when the learning process is still in the beginning.

Exactly! I am a beginner with Witte's systems of astrology but find his techniques fascinating/intriguing.

linchi wrote:

My techniques are different from conventional Uranian system.

Indeed, far different-- but interesting.

linchi wrote:

Thank you for the invitation, if I had the time, I would drop by from time to time.

I understand linchi about limited time. If you ever have any observations about the USA Boyd Chart, I would be interested with your individual techniques.

Hi Steve,

here is an English-language site about Uranian Astrology, maybe you are interested, when you don't know this site yet.

http://www.uranian-institute.org/

And a uranian astrology program, may be an option for you.

http://www.uranian-institute.org/xsoftware.htm

SteveS wrote: If you ever have any observations about the USA Boyd Chart, I would be interested with your individual techniques.

It's in my to-do list.

Thanks linchi for the links. I will be sure to read the articles for my learning curve.

hey linchi,

i too would like to thank you for sharing what you do here with us! i didn't say anything, but i did review your article and the incredible amount of work you put into all this...

i have only one question for the moment.... it is regarding use of the mean node.... have you tried working with the true node?? i got into looking at the use of the true node more and am presently working with true, as opposed to mean nodes..

cheers
james

You're welcome, James,
You can't imagine how your comment encourages me.I also want to thank you for your comment.

I have not yet used the true node.For two years I prepared a comparison for Therese with a few examples. It was only about the marriage event. I could have checked other events, but I didn't have that much time then.

Here is this work, for those who do not know it yet.

https://ia803101.us.archive.org/3/items ... ode%20.pdf

When I would feel better, I would prepare a second work with several examples.
I would be interested if you could give one or two examples of why you think the true nodes are better.

for example :

On 12 July 2020 Benjamin Keough died of suicide in Calabasas, California.

https://www.astro.com/astro-databank/Keough,_Benjamin

He has in radix (harmonic 64) : MA/SA = MO/ME = ME/MN , if you use mean node. This is suicide formula in my work. But if you use true node, it has nothing to do with the radix MA/SA axis.

what's more, harmonic 64 :

Solar MN= Solar MO
Lunar MN = natal MO

I know, of course, that just one example is not enough evidence.


Greetings

linchi