Rahu/Ketu Linked to Karma & Reincarnation
Posted: Mon May 09, 2022 10:48 am
I am researching the history of the use of lunar nodes in astrology for a forthcoming talk and likely later paper on the subject.
One of the topics that intrigues me is if the current focus on karma and reincarnation in regards Rahu and Ketu is a recent phenomena in Jyotish or not?
While karma and reincarnation are basic to Hindiusm it cannot be axiomatically assumed that these ideas were attributed especially to Rahu and Ketu in traditional Jyotish texts.
Going back a few decades for example books like ''Light on Life: An Introduction to the Astrology of India'' by Hart De Fouw, and Dr. Robert Svoboda,state that karma is something that should be examined in the whole horoscope. I have come across other modern books that attribute karma to specific houses or Saturn.
In Chris Brennan's astrology podcast with Ronnie Dreyer in February 2021 entitled ''The Early History and Meanings of the Nodes in Astrology'' it was noted that none of the older texts examined supported the notion of linking Rahu and Ketu especially to Karma and previous lives. Indeed the nodes dont seem to get a mention at all in early texts like Brihat Jatika, Brihat Samhita or Sarvali. While Var??hamihira does mention Ketu in the Brihat Samhita it is solely in relation to comets not the nodes.
Here is the link to the podcast:
https://theastrologypodcast.com/2021/02 ... astrology/
Chris Brennan put over the theory that ironically the ''Karmic'' interpretation of the Rahu and Ketu came from 1970s figures in western astrology like Martin Shulman in his book The Moon's Nodes and Reincarnation (1975)
Moreover, Chris Brennan strongly put over his belief that the source linking the nodes heavily to karma and reincarnation in Jyotish was the British based Jyotishi Komilla Sutton in her book ''The Lunar Nodes: Crisis and Redemption'' (2001).
Ronnie Dreyer was a little more cautious to accept Brennan's view and pointed out Indian astrology was not monolithic and that there were lineages in Jyotish transmitted orally that may not show up in the texts.
So I suppose there are two questions.
Is Brennan correct that the particular focus on karma and reincarnation linked to Rahu and Ketu is a recent phenomenon not supported in the older texts?
If we accept Brennan's basic notion is he also correct that Komilla Sutton is the likely source of this cross fertilisation into Jyotish or could that process have started much earlier?
I am aware of figures in the early 20th century N Chidambaram Iyer,
and Suryanarain Rao who were astrologers and Indian Theosophists. Both interacted with English Theosophist astrologers like Alan Leo. Although, despite Leo's belief in karma and reincarnation he doesn't seem to have been very interested in the nodes and didn't focus on them in regards karma.
I confess I am still to study the large corpus of writings by B.V. Raman who certainly encountered western astrology. Raman was of course the grandson of Suryanarain Rao.
Any views?
Thanks
Mark
One of the topics that intrigues me is if the current focus on karma and reincarnation in regards Rahu and Ketu is a recent phenomena in Jyotish or not?
While karma and reincarnation are basic to Hindiusm it cannot be axiomatically assumed that these ideas were attributed especially to Rahu and Ketu in traditional Jyotish texts.
Going back a few decades for example books like ''Light on Life: An Introduction to the Astrology of India'' by Hart De Fouw, and Dr. Robert Svoboda,state that karma is something that should be examined in the whole horoscope. I have come across other modern books that attribute karma to specific houses or Saturn.
In Chris Brennan's astrology podcast with Ronnie Dreyer in February 2021 entitled ''The Early History and Meanings of the Nodes in Astrology'' it was noted that none of the older texts examined supported the notion of linking Rahu and Ketu especially to Karma and previous lives. Indeed the nodes dont seem to get a mention at all in early texts like Brihat Jatika, Brihat Samhita or Sarvali. While Var??hamihira does mention Ketu in the Brihat Samhita it is solely in relation to comets not the nodes.
Here is the link to the podcast:
https://theastrologypodcast.com/2021/02 ... astrology/
Chris Brennan put over the theory that ironically the ''Karmic'' interpretation of the Rahu and Ketu came from 1970s figures in western astrology like Martin Shulman in his book The Moon's Nodes and Reincarnation (1975)
Moreover, Chris Brennan strongly put over his belief that the source linking the nodes heavily to karma and reincarnation in Jyotish was the British based Jyotishi Komilla Sutton in her book ''The Lunar Nodes: Crisis and Redemption'' (2001).
Ronnie Dreyer was a little more cautious to accept Brennan's view and pointed out Indian astrology was not monolithic and that there were lineages in Jyotish transmitted orally that may not show up in the texts.
So I suppose there are two questions.
Is Brennan correct that the particular focus on karma and reincarnation linked to Rahu and Ketu is a recent phenomenon not supported in the older texts?
If we accept Brennan's basic notion is he also correct that Komilla Sutton is the likely source of this cross fertilisation into Jyotish or could that process have started much earlier?
I am aware of figures in the early 20th century N Chidambaram Iyer,
and Suryanarain Rao who were astrologers and Indian Theosophists. Both interacted with English Theosophist astrologers like Alan Leo. Although, despite Leo's belief in karma and reincarnation he doesn't seem to have been very interested in the nodes and didn't focus on them in regards karma.
I confess I am still to study the large corpus of writings by B.V. Raman who certainly encountered western astrology. Raman was of course the grandson of Suryanarain Rao.
Any views?
Thanks
Mark