https://www.astro.com/astro-databank/Rodger,_Elliot

This is the least ambiguous chart I’ve ever stumbled upon. I wanted to bring it to the forums attention, as I think there’s invaluable depth and value present in its simplicity.

here is an easier link - astrodatabank... your long url has messed up the format here..

and... his last name is rodger, not rodgers... roger, roger?? lol..

it also rates the chart C, so it is definitely more ambiguous then you suggest!

https://www.astro.com/astro-databank/Rodger,_Elliot

Source Notes
Starkman quotes his manifesto published in YouTube: "on the morning of 24th July 1991 I was born in London". 8.00 am is used.

Starkman rectified it to 8.10 am

a true wrecktification chart, lol...

james_m wrote:here is an easier link - astrodatabank... your long url has messed up the format here..

and... his last name is rodger, not rodgers... roger, roger?? lol..

it also rates the chart C, so it is definitely more ambiguous then you suggest!

https://www.astro.com/astro-databank/Rodger,_Elliot

Source Notes
Starkman quotes his manifesto published in YouTube: "on the morning of 24th July 1991 I was born in London". 8.00 am is used.

Starkman rectified it to 8.10 am

a true wrecktification chart, lol...

Thank you for the revised link and the correction.

Props to Starkman for rectifying. I should have checked the rodden rating before posting

Though I’ve not done too much due diligence on this chart myself, the rectification on its face checks out. Virgoan constitution, moreso than Leo. The circumstances of the revised fifth house also check out (the profected year he snapped). Mc in the 9th (brooding), its ruler angular rather than succedent, etc.

Ic shifts from Pluto a tad, but I think fortune moving into a closer conjunction with Saturn picks up any of the slack there, and makes more sense.

Having said that, the sheer potency of regulus reflected in the new chart is even more impressive. Chart ruler (also revised asc bound lord) is significantly further away from the Little King than was the unrectified ascendant, and yet it’s safe to say that those who give a 5 degree orb of influence to regulus (I also apply it out-of-sign) are completely vindicated here. Despite the increased aspectual distance and/or sign boundary, as well as the radical shift in angularity- Elliot Rodger had a (distinctly) leonic ego so huge that only one celestial influence could fit the bill.

Notable also is that the chart ruler moves from the first degrees to the last degrees of Leo. Perhaps some insight to be gleaned there as to the nature of leos progression as a sign.

But in any event -:00 or :10- the chart is remarkable.

hi Franzschubert

can you do us a favour and get rid of the link in your first post as it is ruining the formatting here and making it a scrolling exercise to read from left to right... use the edit feature and delete the ridiculously long url..

thanks
james

james_m wrote:hi Franzschubert

can you do us a favour and get rid of the link in your first post as it is ruining the formatting here and making it a scrolling exercise to read from left to right... use the edit feature and delete the ridiculously long url..

thanks
james

Done and done.