Hello Ouranos,
you're welcome - and your wondering is legitimate. I can assure you that I don't feast on such topics as cancer disease or suicide.
The reason why I currently focus on cancer simply is my intention to show that the claims that Cemal made in his publication about cancer diseases are valid.
Replicability is a very important principle in the sciences and therefore I would like to see more of such principles also included in astrology. I don't know any other astrological researcher than Cemal who uses the principle of replicability as frequent and extended as he does.
But I know that opinions what astrology is, should be, differ greatly among astrologers. Some even see astrology on the same level as Tarot-card-practices

. You know, I myself don't consider myself a missionary but I personally have high standards when it comes to astrology.
Also one reason why I recently focused on astrological cancer examples is the fact that the claimed signifiers (NE, PL, NE/PL) are slow moving planets. This circumstance is quite convenient for astrologers because in these special (cancer) cases the exact birth times are not required and as you know there are many problems in gaining examples that privide a reliable birth time in each single case.
But your objection as I have stated above of course is legitimate (astrological content with negative connotations). I take your objections into consideration for next time.
To address your question about the inclusion of sums and differences alltogether with halfsums I can say that with regard to Microastrology where one needs to use ZET Geo for astrological computing, I have to say that ZET Geo is not the ultimate (and conveniant) software for the purpose of also including differences and sums.
And in my personal view (according to my own astrological experience) mixing of sums, differences and halfsums make things unnecessarily complicated and also defies the important scientific principle of Occam's razor. I am absolutely convinced that with regard to astrological practice (research!) we desperately need to follow accepted scientific principles and standards, such as replicability, Occam's razor etc. Including sums and differences together with halfsums easily obscures the topic instead of clarifiying it. And when the aim, the purpose is to come as close as possible to reliable astrological predictions then the inclusion of sums, differences together with halfsums produces a nightmare. Mixing it alltogether you simply can claim everything and hypothesis-testing becomes a disaster. Believe me! Of course I know that a lot of people disagree with my point of view.
I have high respect and I am very grateful for the ingenuity of Cemal Çiçek, the developer of the pool of methods, that can be summarized under the name "Microastrology". He has truly done a great job! ????
I am sure that in the future people will acknowledge the ingenuity of Cemals awesome astrological achievements.
I know about a special branch of Hamburg School of Astrology, the "Freiburg" branch (Freiburg/Breisgau, Germany) where the inclusion of sums and differences alltogether with halfsums is a common practice. The leader of this group is Karsten F. Kröncke, 80, who is living in Freiburg. He has provided different kinds of special software (for Uranian Astrology), suitable for including sums and differences alltogether with halfsums.
The name of the (main) software is WSL (
Witte,
Sieggrün,
Lefeldt).
Karsten also provides an astrological internet forum, called "Astrologie WSL Forum" (
https://astrologiewslforum.astrax.de/app.php/portal) where people can post content with regard to Uranian Astrology. For non-German-Speakers the participation here is quite difficult because this forum only suits German-speaking people.
I will consider your objections next time and try to post a content that is not as dark and grim as the cancer topic. But I can't promise because one of the important issues is the quality of the astrological data.
Zachariel