Spurious tests of astrology
Posted: Sun Mar 03, 2024 5:02 pm
I wonder how many astrologers got a copy of the email sent to me:
https://twitter.com/SpencrGreenberg/sta ... 9781560570
I don't see anything worthwhile in this. It is about as scientific as a pub quiz and about as relevant as a newbie astrologer asking themselves 10 questions a day to test if horary works.
Spencer is claiming that a professional astrologer helped to set up the parameters of this test which is a bit demoralising if true. I wonder if said astrologer makes it part of their professional practice to look at charts and guess who they belong to, without any sense of context or purpose.
I am glad to see that the general reaction on social media has been to recognise this shady set up for what it is, so that the astrological community as a whole can be seen to be disapproving and not willing to play into this.
Abigail Joy wrote a good blog post about this - worth checking out on her blog:
https://seebystarlight.substack.com/p/i ... lly-proves
Still, some astrologers seem to think that studies like this can be useful for validating astrology. I absolutely disagree - there is a reason why astrologers are traditionally known as 'artists', and in a subject that deals with metaphysics and symbolism, I don't believe that astrology can ever be measured purely objectively except in certain very well-set-up experiments (such as Gauquelins) which is looking much more specifically at wide, mundane trends - but then the lesson has to be learned of the hash the scientific/research community made of handling that.
Lest anyone has forgotten, remember the woeful tale of sTARBABY and read this link:
https://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/sTARBABY
I don't usually share emails but the same message has been widely promoted on X and social media, inviting astrologers to get in touch and take part.Hi Deborah, hope you are doing well! You come recommended as an excellent astrologer. We (ClearerThinking.org) have developed a scientific test of astrological skill and were wondering whether you'd like to participate. There is a $1000 prize for those who perform well, and performing well on the test would be a great way to prove to the world in a scientifically valid way that your readings are valid.
The test design is as follows:
Half the time, we'll present a full astrological chart (based on birth date, time, and location) and then show you a list of 5 famous people and you have to use your reading of the chart to say which of the 5 famous people the astrological chart belongs to, using only the chart (no outside information).
The other half the time, we'll present a full astrological chart (based on event date, time, and location) and show you a list of 5 famous world events, and you have to say which of the 5 events the astrological chart belongs to, using only the chart (no outside information).
If you get at least 10 out of the 12 correct, you win the $1000 prize!
The test would be conducted via video chat, would be recorded, and would involve you screen sharing during it.
If you'd like to participate please let us know! If astrology truly works, we hope this will help prove it to the world in a scientifically valid way.
Thanks very much for your time!
Spencer Greenberg
spencer@clearerthinking.org
https://twitter.com/SpencrGreenberg/sta ... 9781560570
I don't see anything worthwhile in this. It is about as scientific as a pub quiz and about as relevant as a newbie astrologer asking themselves 10 questions a day to test if horary works.
Spencer is claiming that a professional astrologer helped to set up the parameters of this test which is a bit demoralising if true. I wonder if said astrologer makes it part of their professional practice to look at charts and guess who they belong to, without any sense of context or purpose.
I am glad to see that the general reaction on social media has been to recognise this shady set up for what it is, so that the astrological community as a whole can be seen to be disapproving and not willing to play into this.
Abigail Joy wrote a good blog post about this - worth checking out on her blog:
https://seebystarlight.substack.com/p/i ... lly-proves
Still, some astrologers seem to think that studies like this can be useful for validating astrology. I absolutely disagree - there is a reason why astrologers are traditionally known as 'artists', and in a subject that deals with metaphysics and symbolism, I don't believe that astrology can ever be measured purely objectively except in certain very well-set-up experiments (such as Gauquelins) which is looking much more specifically at wide, mundane trends - but then the lesson has to be learned of the hash the scientific/research community made of handling that.
Lest anyone has forgotten, remember the woeful tale of sTARBABY and read this link:
https://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/sTARBABY