Skyscript Astrology Forum

Source:
https://astrologiewslforum.astrax.de/vi ... 24e9a14f98

Born as:
Melanie Fehrenbach
* 10 July 2006 at 06:05 pm CED (04:05 pm UTC)
Titisee-Neustadt, Germany, 47°n55'34", 008°e11'18"

Event:
Driver's license test successfully passed
19 March 2024 at 11:00 am CET (10:00 am CET)
Freiburg im Breisgau (New Town Hall), 47°n59'46", 007°e50'57"

Prediction according to
Lexicon for Planetary Pictures - A Key to Uranian Astrology, Michael Feist (Witte-Verlag Publishing), Hamburg, Germany, Revised Edition 2020
Rules for Planetary Pictures - The Astrology of Tomorrow, Michael Feist (Witte-Verlag Publishing), Hamburg, Germany, Revised Edition 2020
Lexikon für Planetenbilder, Ludwig Rudolph (Witte-Verlag) Hamburg 1957
Regelwerk für Planetenbilder, Michael Feist (Witte Verlag), Hamburg, korrigierte und erweiterte Ausgabe 2012


EXAMINATION SUCCESSFULLY PASSED: Jupiter/Pluto = Kronos/x (JU/KR = KR/x)

VEHICLE: Moon/Mercury (MO/ME)

THE FORTUNATE (HAPPY) WOMAN, HAPPY HOURS: Moon/Jupiter (MO/JU)

LOGIC, PONDER, TO PASS JUDGEMENT: Mercury/Saturn (ME/SA)

CONTROLLED ACTIVITY, WELL PLANNED EFFORTS. GOAL ORIENTED. ACHIEVEMENTS. PERFORMANCE: Zeus (ZE)

FORTUNATE ACTIVITY. TO BRING GOOD LUCK AND BENEFITS: Jupiter/Zeus (JU/ZE)


Lunar Return - 5 March 2024 at 06:57:30 pm GMT (Harmonic 64)


natal JU/PL (4°18'24") = lunar PL/KR (4°17'6") = natal MO/ME (2°53'21")

Harmonic 128: 2°48'45"
Harmonic 256: 1°24'22"

4°18'24" - 2°53'21" = 1°25'3"
exact harmonic = 1°24'22"
deviation from exact harmonic: 41"

4°17'24" - 2°53'21" = 1°23'45"
deviation f. e. h. = 37"

4°18'24" - 4°17'6" = 1'18 (difference)


Lunar Return Progressed (Harmonic 64)


lunar return progressed (lrp) JU/PL (1°45'44") = lrp SU/KR (1°46'28") = natal MO/JU 1°43'46") = lrp ME/SA (4°32'19") = natal ZE (1°43'53")

Harmonic 128: 2°48'45"
Harmonic 256: 1°24'22"

1°46'28" - 1°45'44" = 44" (difference)
1°46'28" - 1°43'46" = 2'42" (difference)
1°46'28" - 1°43'53" = 2'35" (difference)

4°32'28" - 1°45'44" = 2°46'35"
exact harmonic = 2°48'45"
dev. f. e. h. = 2'10"

4°32'19" - 1°46'28" = 2°45'51"
exact harmonic = 2°48'45"
dev. f. e. h. = 2'54"

4°32'19" - 1°43'46" = 2°48'33"
exact harmonic = 2°48'45"
dev. f. e. h. = 12"

4°32'19" - 1°43'53" = 2°48'26"
exact harmonic = 2°48'45"
dev. f. e. h. = 19"


Secundary Progressions (Harmonic 64)


natal JU/PL (4°18'24") = PLsp/KRn (2°53'19") = natal MO/ME (2°53'21")

Harmonic 128: 2°48'45"
Harmonic 256: 1°24'22"

4°18'24" - 2°53'21" = 1°25'3"
exact harmonic = 1°24'22"
dev. f. e. h. = 41"

4°18'24" - 2°53' 19" = 1°25'5"
exact harmonic = 1°24'22"
dev. f. e. h. = 43"


Transit Moon Phase 1st Quarter, 17 March 2024 at 05:10:35 am CET (Harmonic 64)


transit MO/ME (3°19'47") = transit JU (3°19'10") = natal PL (4°42'46") = natal MO/KR (0°29'49")

Harmonic 128: 2°48'45"
Harmonic 256: 1°24'22"

4°42'46" - 3°19'47" = 1°22'59"
exact harmonic = 1°24'22"
dev. f. e. h. = 1'23"

4°42'46" - 0°29'49" = 4°12'57"
4°12'57" - 2°48'45" = 1°24'12" (dev. f. e. h. = 10")


Transits (Harmonic 64)


transit JU/PL (2°50'28") = natal KR (1°26'8") = natal SU (0°2'3") = natal MO/ME (2°53'21") [= natal JU/ZE (0°0'13")]

Harmonic 128: 2°48'45"
Harmonic 256: 1°24'22"

2°50'28" - 1°26'8" = 1°24'20"
exact harmonic = 1°24'22"
dev. f. e. h. = 2"

2°53'21" - 1°26'8" = 1°27'13"
exact harmonic = 1°24'22"
dev. f. e. h. = 2'51"

2°53'21" - 2°50'28" = 2'53" (difference)

2°53'21" - 0° 2'3" = 2°51'18"
exact harmonic = 2°48'45"
dev. f. e. h. = 2'33"

2°50'28" - 0°2'3" = 2°48'25"
exact harmonic = 2°48'45"
dev. f. e. h. = 20"

2°53'21" - 0°0'13" = 2°53'8"
exact harmonic = 2°48'45"
dev. f. e. h. = 4'23"

2°50'28" - 0°0'13" = 2°50'15"
exact harmonic = 2°48'45"
dev. f. e. h. = 1'30"


Zachariel

Thank you Zachariel for taking the time to combine several midpoints together in your analysis.
And also moving away from death and suicide.

I have 2 questions for you
1) What time did you use for the test successfully passed?
Beginning or end of the exam?
Time when she received the confirmation?
Other?

2) I see that you consistently used the 64th Harmonic (Lunar Return, Lunar Return Progressed, Secondary Progressions, 1st Q Moon and Transits) and to some extent 128th and 256th in the background.
Why use the 64th over lesser Harmonics?

Thank you,
Ouranos

Hi Ouranos,

ad question 1:
I simply used the same event-time that Karsten F. Kröncke had used in his forum posting (just examine in his posting on the Four-Level-Graphic (R-P-S-T) the lower margin of this picture, where you can find the event information. But notice that he did not use as time-zone "CET" but UTC!).
I gave the link to Karstens posting at the very beginning of my own posting in the Skyscript-Forum.

Ad question 2.1:
Perhaps I have to clarify something. In my posting when presenting the different charts (Lunar Return, Lunar Return Progressed, Secundary Progressions, Transit Moon Phase 1st Quarter and Transit (of the actual time of passing the driver's license test) I used throughout only Harmonic 64.

The passages 'H-128: 2°48'45" and H-256: 1°24'22" just serve the purpose to help to understand my calculations about the deviation of each Midpoint, Planet or Transneptunian from perfect harmonic data value. As Cemal has often showed in his postings on Skyscript sometimes you have to subtract or add the value that forms the sqare or opposition to the actual value of the position of the elements (midpoints or Planets or TNPs) that form the planetary picture.
These calculations I made after presenting each single chart just served the purpose to determine the actual orbs.

Ad question 2.2: ("Why use the 64th harmonic over lesser Harmonics?)
In Microastrology we only use harmonics based on the power of two. (Cemal: "Only harmonics that divide Zodiac into 2 must be used.")
The power of 2 are used in science, engineering, music, ...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_of_two

As Cemal has pointed out, all these harmonics (based on the power of two) are of equal rank. Harmonic 16 is not "better" than Harmonic 64. And Harmonic 64 is not "better" than Harmonic 128, 256, ...

I hope my statements could help to clarify things a bit.

Zachariel

Thank you for your explanations Zachariel,
I couldn't find the explanation of the time he used in his analysis but I will rely on his choice.
And he worked and found the answer with the 16th Harmonic.
One difference I noticed with your analysis is that he incorporates the MC. And the AS as a secondary component.
Any reason you do not use them in your analysis?
And there would be a lot more to say about waves in the Harmonics.
Keeping in mind that Uranian astrology and Cosmobiology have concentrated their effort on the multiple of 2 but not much has been said or investigated with the other scales 3, 5 and 7 if we stay in the lower scale range. But that's a different topic.

Appreciate your analysis,
Ouranos

Unfortunately, people who consider themselves astrologers do not sufficiently deal with the harmonics based on the power of two, rejecting these harmonics prematurely.
They also persistently ignore the countless practical case studies on a wide variety of topics that Cemal has presented. They also ignore the high significance of the replicability of certain planetary pictures for certain facts/events. Sad but true.

This is very unfortunate, but it must simply be acknowledged. These people feel comfortable and feel good about themselves when thy get stuck with Harmonic 1. But then they shouldn't complain that the astrological fog is blocking their view.

Maybe the future will bring other generations of astrologers who can understand and will appreciate the astrological gems that were given to us by Cemal Çiçek.