Skyscript Astrology Forum

Catherine, Princess of Wales, announces she has cancer


9 January 1982 at 19:00 (= 7:00 PM )Reading, England, 51n28, 0w59

Medical procedure 16 January 2024 (Abdominal surgery)


https://www.astro.com/astro-databank/Ca ... s_of_Wales



We take the correct birth time 23:33


Radix (Harmonic 128)

r SU/PL = r NE/PL = r VE (Venus shows the body part)




Solar Return (Harmonic 128)

solar NE/PL = r SU/PL = r NE/PL = r VE




Progressed Lunar Return (Harmonic 128)


p NE/PL = r SU/PL = r NE/PL = r VE



Lunar Return (Harmonic 128)


lunar SU/NE = r PL




Saturn Return (Harmonic 128)

s SU/VE = s NE/PL = r SU



Transit on 16.01.2024 12:00 (Harmonic 16)

Because the time of the operation is not known, we are looking at Hamonic 16

t SU = r NE/PL

t SU/VE = t MA/SA = r SU





Catherine, Princess of Wales, announces she has cancer on 22 March 2024

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catherine ... les#Health


Secondary Progression (Harmonic 128)


p NE/PL = r ME/WI




My work: Astrological Research Cancer Diseases

https://ia601001.us.archive.org/2/items ... seases.pdf

Hi linchi,
thank you for this very informative posting. The redundancies with regard to the event-related planetary picture (for cancer disease) prove very clearly and irrefutably the correctness of your statements you have made in the publication "Astrological Research Cancer Diseases (June 13, 2018)".

It is very strange and difficult for me to understand why the results you have found (also in relation to the wide range of other topics you have covered) do not resonate more with the astrologically interested community.

I find this ignorance very sad and frustrating.

Best wishes,
Zachariel

Zachariel wrote: Mon Mar 25, 2024 5:50 pm It is very strange and difficult for me to understand why the results you have found (also in relation to the wide range of other topics you have covered) do not resonate more with the astrologically interested community.

I find this ignorance very sad and frustrating.

Hi Zachariel,

There are various reasons for this, because there are very different people who are involved in astrology and ignore my discoveries.

The first group are those who want to sell something to make money.

The second group are those who think they are the smartest. Therefore, they cannot accept that there are others who are smarter.

The third group are those who think that Europeans and Americans are the smartest. But not an Asian, for God's sake. They can't accept that.
Then when I read that they write about spirituality, I have to laugh, because a spiritual person can't be that selfish.

The fourth group are those who think astrology is like tarot and you have to interpret it. They don't even know that astrology is an exact mathematical science. They wouldn't understand it anyway because they lack intelligence.

The fifth group, who are generally concerned with the tropical zodiac. They wouldn't be interested either because their world would collapse because they have been dealing with the tropical zodiac for so many years.

The sixth group are those who are like religion followers. You can't teach them anything new anyway.

I am not interested in them at all. I don't expect anything from them. I know what I have discovered. That's enough for me. What did Johann Gottfried Seume say?

"The wise man does not ask whether he is honored. He alone determines his value."


Thank you

linchi

Why that birth time which is so different from what we know? Any evidence?
And why Harmonics 128 ?

Lunlumo wrote: Mon Mar 25, 2024 8:22 pm Why that birth time which is so different from what we know?

What do you know? What time of birth should we use? and why ?

Any evidence?

here:

https://skyscript.co.uk/forums/viewtopic.php?t=11447

Do you have any evidence for other birth times ?

And why Harmonics 128 ?

Why not ?

Not that kind of dialogue I prefer...

Lunlumo wrote: Tue Mar 26, 2024 1:33 pm Not that kind of dialogue I prefer...

then go somewhere else

I'll do so - looking forward to that! (And I know why...!)

linchi wrote: Tue Mar 26, 2024 2:11 pm then go somewhere else

Please keep a civil tone and remember that this is a discussion forum, not a one-man show.

I'm not making one-man show here. I share my knowledge with those who are receptive.

I answered him with the same tone as he asked me.

linchi wrote: Mon Mar 25, 2024 9:24 pm

Lunlumo wrote: Mon Mar 25, 2024 8:22 pm Why that birth time which is so different from what we know?

What do you know? What time of birth should we use? and why ?

Any evidence?

here:

https://skyscript.co.uk/forums/viewtopic.php?t=11447

Do you have any evidence for other birth times ?

And why Harmonics 128 ?

Why not ?

No, Lunlumo's questions were tersely phrased but not rude. I'm making allowances for people not being native speakers of English, but your diatribe just a few posts earlier makes your attitude towards anyone who disagrees with you unmistakable. A discussion forum is a place for discussion, that is, exchange of knowledge and opinions. If you consider someone else's views to be factually wrong, that's fine: you're absolutely at liberty to say so, and to explain why. But that doesn't change the fundamental purpose of the forum. If you want to share your own views without being questioned or contradicted, or if you can't handle being questioned or contradicted (or ignored) without being rude and dismissive, then I suggest that you heed your own advice and set up shop somewhere else.

Martin Gansten wrote: Tue Mar 26, 2024 7:08 pm No, Lunlumo's questions were tersely phrased but not rude.

That's your opinion, Martin. My opinion is quite different.

Where I write or where I don't write is none of your business.