Hi everyone,

Astrologers such as John Frawley, Anthony Louis and Ema Kurent have chapters about these topics in their horary books.
They treat them as secondary indicators, in contrast to primary testimonies, that is.
I also use them, quite often, but try not to let those chart points overshadow primary indicators in the judgement.

How about you?
Do you use fixed stars and arabic parts in horary?
If the answer is ´yes´, how do you use them?

Hi,

In many years of practicing horary I remember a few cases where I did use Lots but not even one where I had to turn to fixed stars for an answer.
All those cases were about marriage/divorce and the relevant lots as per Frawley indications did help me to unravel confused or just difficult charts even if the final judgment depends always on the main significators.
I found the lots good at finding the true inclinations of the parties involved toward ending or continuing their relationship.
I relay on the position (house and aspects) and receptions of the Lords of the Lots with the main significators.
About the NON use of the fixed stars I dont really know what to say, most likely it's just a bad habit of mine....

regards
Saturnello

Saurnello,
Thank you for sharing from your experience.

In horaries I always look for conjunctions with fixed stars or lots but they seem to be not very important to me. In event charts or weather forecasting they are as far as I know by now by own experience!