Reframing Astrology/Science debate by the Leo/Aquarius axis
Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 3:54 am
With today's Ingress of the Lunar North Node into Aquarius, I would like to open a new thread to reframe the astrology/science debate by the Leo/Aquarius axis.
Objective of this thread is to:
1. develop significators for science and astrology
2. make predictions based on upcoming eclipses in Leo/Aquarius
3. watch events unfold in the next few years.
Assumption for this thread: Dorothean triplicity rulers, Egyptian bound rulers, Decans of Varahamihira (based on triplicity, not Chaldean decans), Lunar Node = Mean Node calculation.
Some of these topics have already been discussed in other threads and I would like to give my thoughts to start:
Significator of astrology: Mercury. This is the traditional significator and I have found it accurate. As a personal example, for various companies I have worked for, I have been able to time my own actions by directions of Mercury to the angles in incorporation charts.
Signs for astrology and science. Late degrees in Leo/Aquarius have been defined as 'astrologer's degrees' and have been discussed elsewhere on the forum. Speaking personally, with Saturn in the 24th degree of Aquarius in the 12th and Mars in the 29th degree of Leo conjunct Regulus in the 6th, I am well familiar with this signification and is one reason why I am starting this thread. But to say that astrology is Leo 'AND' Aquarius is a bit sloppy. Astrology cannot be 'both'; though because of the polarity of signs, malefics in one sign may throw the signification back to the opposing sign.
My current hypothesis which I would like to tighten up this month is:
astrology = Mercury/Aquarius
science = Saturn/Aquarius
humanism = Leo
I think the thing which has really confused discussion on this issue is that the current astrology/science debate has more to do with humanism vs astrology than science vs astrology. It's only with the rise of humanism among scientists that the debate has become what we have today. I propose that the reason why astrology was considered science in the old days was because Mercury/Aquarius and Saturn/Aquarius are really blood brothers. Something happened astrologically to split this apart.
The application of Abu Mashar's method for determining the rise of prophets through conjunctional astrology is one way of testing this kind of logic, taking a more loose definition of 'prophet' as any individual who creates and leads a religious sect (this would include humanist scientists). One could make an entire career out of this line of research which is way beyond what I wish to do here.
But to stir the pot a little, consider the 4 March 1981 Jupiter-Saturn conjunction with Mercury 20 Aquarius. If I am right and Mercury/Aquarius signifies astrology, then we should be able to see some events when this planet is highlighted dynamically. How to do this? For a JSC, Abu Mashar says there are two ways to profect the conjunction, the Ascendant and the JSC degree itself. Profecting the Ascendant requires a location, will take a pass on that; profecting the JSC does not. At the rate of 30 degrees a year, the profection of the Jupiter-Saturn conjunction reached Mercury on 29 July 1985 and 29 July 1997 so far (12 year cycle - next 29 July 2009). Anything happen regarding revival of traditional astrology on those dates? Please chime in.
My point of bringing up the Jupiter-Saturn cycle is that once the signifiators are properly defined, we should be able to predict astrology's rise and fall through history by applying Abu Mashar's rules for the rise of prophets and religious sects to significators of astrology and science in these Jupiter-Saturn figures. Why nobody has taken a crack at this so far is kind of mysterious to me.
Anyway, to confirm the significators, I would like to look at no more than 3-4 natal charts of pro-astrology and anti-astrology individuals of historical significance and see which configuration was responsible for a specific event. Thinking like Paul Kurtz' second Humanist Manifesto of 1973 for an anti-astrology view. I need help with birth data, though am willing to rectify most anything these days with minimal data.
So any suggestions for specific individuals and events? 3 pro and 3 anti-astrology? Over to you guys.
one last thing: Something else I have seen related to the Leo-Aquarius axis is a pro and anti Catholic bias. Saturn/Leo in USA President Fillmore's figure was related to anti-Catholicism, also anti-Masonry. On the flip side is Jupiter/Leo which I have seen signify a 'God and Country' philosophy which is a complete unification of church and state, involves creeds and the like. Have also seen this in several pro-Catholic figures. Constantine (Rome) is an example of a unifier of church and state with a creed (Niceane Creed, also big opponent of astrology); Huckabee is the most recent Jupiter/Leo individual to pledge for unification of church and state. One can also see that both astrologers and Catholics were on the wrong side of Charles II restoration. What the connection is between astrology and Catholicism needs further fleshing out. Perhaps John Frawley can ring in on this one.
Sorry to ramble, a bit of Gemini on this end.
Objective of this thread is to:
1. develop significators for science and astrology
2. make predictions based on upcoming eclipses in Leo/Aquarius
3. watch events unfold in the next few years.
Assumption for this thread: Dorothean triplicity rulers, Egyptian bound rulers, Decans of Varahamihira (based on triplicity, not Chaldean decans), Lunar Node = Mean Node calculation.
Some of these topics have already been discussed in other threads and I would like to give my thoughts to start:
Significator of astrology: Mercury. This is the traditional significator and I have found it accurate. As a personal example, for various companies I have worked for, I have been able to time my own actions by directions of Mercury to the angles in incorporation charts.
Signs for astrology and science. Late degrees in Leo/Aquarius have been defined as 'astrologer's degrees' and have been discussed elsewhere on the forum. Speaking personally, with Saturn in the 24th degree of Aquarius in the 12th and Mars in the 29th degree of Leo conjunct Regulus in the 6th, I am well familiar with this signification and is one reason why I am starting this thread. But to say that astrology is Leo 'AND' Aquarius is a bit sloppy. Astrology cannot be 'both'; though because of the polarity of signs, malefics in one sign may throw the signification back to the opposing sign.
My current hypothesis which I would like to tighten up this month is:
astrology = Mercury/Aquarius
science = Saturn/Aquarius
humanism = Leo
I think the thing which has really confused discussion on this issue is that the current astrology/science debate has more to do with humanism vs astrology than science vs astrology. It's only with the rise of humanism among scientists that the debate has become what we have today. I propose that the reason why astrology was considered science in the old days was because Mercury/Aquarius and Saturn/Aquarius are really blood brothers. Something happened astrologically to split this apart.
The application of Abu Mashar's method for determining the rise of prophets through conjunctional astrology is one way of testing this kind of logic, taking a more loose definition of 'prophet' as any individual who creates and leads a religious sect (this would include humanist scientists). One could make an entire career out of this line of research which is way beyond what I wish to do here.
But to stir the pot a little, consider the 4 March 1981 Jupiter-Saturn conjunction with Mercury 20 Aquarius. If I am right and Mercury/Aquarius signifies astrology, then we should be able to see some events when this planet is highlighted dynamically. How to do this? For a JSC, Abu Mashar says there are two ways to profect the conjunction, the Ascendant and the JSC degree itself. Profecting the Ascendant requires a location, will take a pass on that; profecting the JSC does not. At the rate of 30 degrees a year, the profection of the Jupiter-Saturn conjunction reached Mercury on 29 July 1985 and 29 July 1997 so far (12 year cycle - next 29 July 2009). Anything happen regarding revival of traditional astrology on those dates? Please chime in.
My point of bringing up the Jupiter-Saturn cycle is that once the signifiators are properly defined, we should be able to predict astrology's rise and fall through history by applying Abu Mashar's rules for the rise of prophets and religious sects to significators of astrology and science in these Jupiter-Saturn figures. Why nobody has taken a crack at this so far is kind of mysterious to me.
Anyway, to confirm the significators, I would like to look at no more than 3-4 natal charts of pro-astrology and anti-astrology individuals of historical significance and see which configuration was responsible for a specific event. Thinking like Paul Kurtz' second Humanist Manifesto of 1973 for an anti-astrology view. I need help with birth data, though am willing to rectify most anything these days with minimal data.
So any suggestions for specific individuals and events? 3 pro and 3 anti-astrology? Over to you guys.
one last thing: Something else I have seen related to the Leo-Aquarius axis is a pro and anti Catholic bias. Saturn/Leo in USA President Fillmore's figure was related to anti-Catholicism, also anti-Masonry. On the flip side is Jupiter/Leo which I have seen signify a 'God and Country' philosophy which is a complete unification of church and state, involves creeds and the like. Have also seen this in several pro-Catholic figures. Constantine (Rome) is an example of a unifier of church and state with a creed (Niceane Creed, also big opponent of astrology); Huckabee is the most recent Jupiter/Leo individual to pledge for unification of church and state. One can also see that both astrologers and Catholics were on the wrong side of Charles II restoration. What the connection is between astrology and Catholicism needs further fleshing out. Perhaps John Frawley can ring in on this one.
Sorry to ramble, a bit of Gemini on this end.