Triplicities: Dorotheus and the 4 cardines
Posted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 6:00 pm
Hello
I'm trying to understand how the triplicities were arrived at.
I've read the thread on Lee Lehmann's ideas, which gives lots of food for thought. I've also read various "rationales" for the triplicity systems, of which I find that of Joseph Crane in his "Practical Guide to Traditional Astrology" the most coherent, though not altogether convincing. Crane uses Dorothean triplicities, which also seem the most coherent to me, on the whole.
Reading Carmen Astrologicum by Dorotheus (translated by David Pingree), I note that right at the beginning Dorotheus says:
"before everything, understand the seven (planets) in longitude and latitude, divide the four cardines by their degrees, and know with this the triplicities of the signs". He then goes on to give the triplicities for Aries/Leo/Sagittarius, etc.
So I'm trying to understand how this jump is made from the mundo cardines (the mundo angles, ie. houses I, IV, VII and X - even if doubtless whole-sign houses) to the celestial signs of the zodiac. Does anybody know what he could mean by "divide the four cardines by their degrees, and know with this the triplicities of the signs" ? It's intriguing, as it sounds like a method for determining the triplicities.
Many thanks for any ideas.
Graham
I'm trying to understand how the triplicities were arrived at.
I've read the thread on Lee Lehmann's ideas, which gives lots of food for thought. I've also read various "rationales" for the triplicity systems, of which I find that of Joseph Crane in his "Practical Guide to Traditional Astrology" the most coherent, though not altogether convincing. Crane uses Dorothean triplicities, which also seem the most coherent to me, on the whole.
Reading Carmen Astrologicum by Dorotheus (translated by David Pingree), I note that right at the beginning Dorotheus says:
"before everything, understand the seven (planets) in longitude and latitude, divide the four cardines by their degrees, and know with this the triplicities of the signs". He then goes on to give the triplicities for Aries/Leo/Sagittarius, etc.
So I'm trying to understand how this jump is made from the mundo cardines (the mundo angles, ie. houses I, IV, VII and X - even if doubtless whole-sign houses) to the celestial signs of the zodiac. Does anybody know what he could mean by "divide the four cardines by their degrees, and know with this the triplicities of the signs" ? It's intriguing, as it sounds like a method for determining the triplicities.
Many thanks for any ideas.
Graham