Has anyone ever followed the 146th guide from Guido Bonatus? 1 by MW Hello,Everyone,brilliant,experienced, In your horary astrology experience ,do you look for and count out the Principal Partner or Secondary Partner or Third Partner etc all of that which are told by Guido Bonatus's great work-Astrologer's Guide the last one (the 146th guide)? Quote: 146. To observe who shall partake in the dominion with the Significators The 146th consideration is, That thou take the place of the Lord of the Ascendant, and the place of the Lord of the 12th , and subtracting the lesser from the greater add to the remainder the degrees of the sign ascending and project from the Ascendant; and where the number falls the Lord of the sign shall be partner with the Lord of the Question, and shall be called the Principal Partner. Again, take the place of the Lord of the said sign, and place of the Lord of the Part of Fortune, and subtracting the lesser from the greater add the degrees of that sign shall be another Partner, and be called the Secondary Partner; which if it happen to be the same Planet, regard only that; but if different, then take both and subtract the lesser from the greater and add the degrees of the sign ascending, and the planet on whose House the number falls shall be the third Partner; and which of those three is the strongest shall be the chiefest sharer in the significations of the thing enquired after. If all the remainders, or two of them, shall happen on the House of one Planet; that shall be preferred. If the Question seem good, and those Partners are ill disposed, they will diminish of the good signified by the Question, and so on the contrary; but if the Question seem evil, and they are well disposed, they will allay and mitigate the evil signified by the Question, and so likewise on the contrary. Quote Tue May 31, 2011 9:48 am
2 by Andrew Bevan No, I can see by my notes in Bonatus that I took the time to figure out the main points of this aphorism, but it seemed like more work and bother than it was worth and then I tend to try and stay out of dark courners. The 146th consideration is a foggy and irritating little thing isn't it? Why did Bonaus even bother to include it? Anyone with better experience, or is it just a manner of trying to get out of a bad days work? http://www.astronor.com Quote Sun Aug 14, 2011 6:36 pm