Antiscia, whole sign aspects, aversion
Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 4:33 am
I've been reading up on the three aforementioned concepts and I've been trying to integrate them the best that I can, however I still feel like there is a big gap in my knowledge. Basically my questions are:
-Can the concept of antiscia and whole sign aspects be integrated together? Because from reading about antiscia I feel like they are implying that there must be some sort of geometric relationship between the two planets in question, as opposed to the signs of the planets themselves merely being in a (somewhat) compatible relationship.
-Secondly, is the concept of antiscia compatible with the concept of aversion? The way I understand it thus far, antiscia/contra-antiscia can make it so that a planet is not considered in aversion from the house it rules. Is this an accurate understanding of the concepts? For me personally, my second house in is aries, and both its domicile, exalted and triplicity rulers are all both in virgo. So given this example, would my 2nd house still be considered in aversion?
-Can the concept of antiscia and whole sign aspects be integrated together? Because from reading about antiscia I feel like they are implying that there must be some sort of geometric relationship between the two planets in question, as opposed to the signs of the planets themselves merely being in a (somewhat) compatible relationship.
-Secondly, is the concept of antiscia compatible with the concept of aversion? The way I understand it thus far, antiscia/contra-antiscia can make it so that a planet is not considered in aversion from the house it rules. Is this an accurate understanding of the concepts? For me personally, my second house in is aries, and both its domicile, exalted and triplicity rulers are all both in virgo. So given this example, would my 2nd house still be considered in aversion?