Thanks James, I heard all of the interview (49 minutes and 6 seconds). I like the last quarter of the interview when she (not her exact words just reproducing what I understood) says that if we are not pushing (Horary Astrologers) others to believe or practice and and if we do not claim to be part of main stream Science than what skeptics are really bothered about.
I would have liked her to further explain the Observer and Observed effect of Horary Astrology and citing book of Geoffrey Cornelius for further study of the divination and magical side of horary astrology (let them do the work too)
I had some wishes in life... like (to mention few)
-What is the real date of birth of the girl i liked 23 years ago?
-What is the real name of certain character in a TV serial 'War of the Worlds'?
-To hear Deborah Houlding
-To visit Lake Titicaca (Bolivia)
etc etc etc etc etc....
(first three have been fulfilled this year )
One of her client had told me that Deb has a (I forgot) Yorkshire? or some Shire accent. Ok I heard her. She looks like a person who means business.
Now, my personal views on astrology and skepticism.
People always have questioned somethings. Its human nature to chat, to gossip, to believe and at the same time not believing the other side of the coin. We have a limited time. I wonder where those skeptics are in my real life interaction with general public. Oh, I demand fee for the session...any session
On a serious note, we can spend life in convincing skeptics and when we are done with it, another fresh breed from college props out and asks the same questions again and the same answers are given again. So, we (astrologers) have 2 options. Either we pursue few other hobbies too, give more attention to some of the things which deserve our attention apart from daily practice as an astrologer Or make a sincere effort in convincing everybody and wasting a lot of our quality time. I prefer the first option.
Pawn to d4...Knight to f6