for some reason i must have looked into the birth data on morin previously as i was able to generate a chart for him with 27 aries 25 rising, which is close, but not exact to the chart he had with 27 aries 17.my midheaven is also out slightly at 13 cap 09, while morins chart has 13 cap 17 like the one you replicated in janus..
A lot of sources give out what they call ?rectified? birth times for Morin, based on times that give the closest matches to his chart. This is because they believe Morin tells us that the time should be 8:33 am LMT 23/2/1583, and they can see that doesn?t work ? they use times in (various time zones) that end up equating to 8:47 am LMT. My point was to show that Morin would not make a mistake about the time of his own chart, and to demonstrate how the information he gave results in the time that has now become known as the ?rectified time?, rather than the authoritative time that Morin gave himself. For example, note the confusion in the source notes on the Astro-databank page
http://www.astro.com/astro-databank/Morinus,_Johannes
Unfortunately, it?s not an open Wiki, otherwise I would have added a comment on the discussion page. (In any case, jiggling around with chart data shouldn?t be referred to as ?rectification? in my opinion ? perhaps something like ?approximation? would be better. Rectification is a process that involves checking a lot of life-events with astrological events, not just flicking computer buttons until you get the positions you want).
a few things.. it is very interesting the comment about the connection of transiting jupiter to the star at 4 gemini. i never use star data, but good to know that morin did.. it is my understanding that transit data was less relevant to astrologers like morin then primary direction data.. is your impression of this different? perhaps tom can comment as i understand he is more knowledgeable on morin then most folks at skyscript..
I?m not an expert on Morin?s technique, but I don?t believe it was ever a case of PD or transits ? transits are always relevant as an activating factor for any astrological cycle; they might come at the end as a ?finishing touch?, but if you get a major configuration that hits several sensitive points of the nativity, that is going to be important. (Just like if an eclipse falls on the degree of someone?s Sun, that person would be expected to feel the effect more directly than others). I didn?t look at any other cycles but only because I don?t have time to do that - Morin would have, of course. My personal interest was focussed on how astrologers of his time noted this particularly unfortunate effect of Jupiter conjunct Aldebaran, and why they noticed it for Jupiter more than any other planet. I?m working on something else that has that alignment, so got sidetracked into noticing Morin?s remarks about the violent deaths of others who had this, and the reference to his own 8th-ruler, then got curious to see if there might have been a Jupiter-Aldebaran line-up when he died. When I checked his time of death and saw that there was, I felt that couldn?t have failed to get his attention. Other things would have too, but I wasn?t looking at them.
the data in the middle chart of your article on morin has longitutde/latitude data that says 4 N 25.. morins chart at the top says 45 - 25.. not sure if that is related.. the data for Villefranche-sur-Sa?ne is 45?59?00?N 4?43?00?E off wiki here -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Villefranc ... Sa%C3%B4ne
this is relatively important as i understand morin was the one to come up with the system for coordinates!!!! we don't want him rolling over in his grave!
My typo in the chart wheel: thanks for pointing it out! I?ve already corrected it.
the other part of your article i wanted to comment on the quote from the late Dr. Carlos Raitzin - " Under the equal house system, the stellium in question falls in his 11th [equal] house and thus the discontents, griefs, and artful manipulations that he was destined to suffer would have been transformed into personal satisfactions arising from his profession, friendships, powerful protectors, happiness and well-being for his parents, and riches for the native; but all of this was resoundingly disproved by the facts of his life."
in fact, if one uses equal house system the way i do, or the way that has been cultivated with the re-introduction of whole sign houses - the pisces stellium does indeed land in the 12th as pisces forms the 12th house cusp putting an emphasis on the 12th house here.
That comment was part of the original page ? I wondered if it still had a place, and decided it does. If I?m looking at a historical chart I?m always interested in having it how the original astrologer drew it and understood it; and its clear he would have loathed any removal of emphasis from his loaded 12th house. Morin also had strong feelings for Regiomontanus and against Placidus, and would have not liked to have had his chart left for posterity according to the Placidus house division, which is often used in modern recreations of his chart. What is worth noting is that Morin had no recognition of a house system that follows the whole-sign principle ? it simply did not exist in his awareness or deserve discussion. In any case, it would have faced the same criticism he makes about the equal house in its detachment of the MC from the 10th house cusp. Robert Corre?s Forum on Astrology site has a lot of good material about Morin, and offers James Holden?s translation of his ?comments on House Division
in His Remarques Astrologiques? ? well worth reading to understand Morin?s views
https://www.forumonastrology.com/foa/newmain.html
finally - if someone would like to look at the primary directions, (direct and converse) using regio (which is what morin used) with the naibod key - below is a page displaying them.. saturn square sun was in effect for 1656. i would associate this with a more difficult year health wise even without the involvement of the 8th house ruler of jupiter using regio..
I?d like that too and hope this stimulates more discussion and input from others. It?s not a case of it would have been this or that, though - astrological techniques reinforce each other. At significant moments a collection of testimonies come together at the same time, and death being one of the most significant moments of life, I would expect it?s potential to be shown by every legitimate astrological technique (if not, you have to question the technique that doesn?t show it!).
One thing I would really like to verify is that report of his death, and the report that he already knew, .. smiled at doctors, etc. Unfortunately Raitzin died in 2001, so without references in his article I don't know how to get to the original source. If anyone can help with that it would be greatly appreciated.