Timekeeping and late classical astrology.
Posted: Wed Jul 26, 2017 3:53 am
I've been interested in both astrology and mechanical clocks since I was small. Now, reasonably accurate mechanical clocks only became possible after the invention of the balance spring in the 1660s and the pendulum clock in the 1670s. It was around this time that the prestige of astrology started to significantly wane among the scientific establishment. Decent mechanical timekeepers, reliable in rain or shine, mostly arrived too late for Lilly and the rest of the late classical astrologers.
I was wondering what the time sources were for the times cited in Christian Astrology and the like. Of course, a properly oriented and constructed sundial could give a reasonably accurate time, although even here the 'equation of time' makes a sundial 'off' by as much as 20 minutes depending on the time of the year. A quadrant could give equally accurate results with some bother, and an astrolabe would work by night. Still, I wonder what the sources for the local time of day were in those delineations. I find it hard to imagine that the sun was shining in London each time Lilly was consulted. Were those astrologers early adopters of better mechanical clocks?
I was wondering what the time sources were for the times cited in Christian Astrology and the like. Of course, a properly oriented and constructed sundial could give a reasonably accurate time, although even here the 'equation of time' makes a sundial 'off' by as much as 20 minutes depending on the time of the year. A quadrant could give equally accurate results with some bother, and an astrolabe would work by night. Still, I wonder what the sources for the local time of day were in those delineations. I find it hard to imagine that the sun was shining in London each time Lilly was consulted. Were those astrologers early adopters of better mechanical clocks?